Behavioural nudges increase COVID-19 vaccinations

被引:0
作者
Hengchen Dai
Silvia Saccardo
Maria A. Han
Lily Roh
Naveen Raja
Sitaram Vangala
Hardikkumar Modi
Shital Pandya
Michael Sloyan
Daniel M. Croymans
机构
[1] University of California,Anderson School of Management
[2] Los Angeles,Department of Social and Decision Sciences
[3] Carnegie Mellon University,Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine
[4] University of California,Office of Population Health and Accountable Care
[5] Los Angeles,Department of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine
[6] University of California,Office of Health Informatics and Analytics
[7] Los Angeles,Department of Information Services and Solutions
[8] University of California,undefined
[9] Los Angeles,undefined
[10] University of California,undefined
[11] Los Angeles,undefined
[12] UCLA Health System,undefined
来源
Nature | 2021年 / 597卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Enhancing vaccine uptake is a critical public health challenge1. Overcoming vaccine hesitancy2,3 and failure to follow through on vaccination intentions3 requires effective communication strategies3,4. Here we present two sequential randomized controlled trials to test the effect of behavioural interventions on the uptake of COVID-19 vaccines. We designed text-based reminders that make vaccination salient and easy, and delivered them to participants drawn from a healthcare system one day (first randomized controlled trial) (n = 93,354 participants; clinicaltrials number NCT04800965) and eight days (second randomized controlled trial) (n = 67,092 individuals; clinicaltrials number NCT04801524) after they received a notification of vaccine eligibility. The first reminder boosted appointment and vaccination rates within the healthcare system by 6.07 (84%) and 3.57 (26%) percentage points, respectively; the second reminder increased those outcomes by 1.65 and 1.06 percentage points, respectively. The first reminder had a greater effect when it was designed to make participants feel ownership of the vaccine dose. However, we found no evidence that combining the first reminder with a video-based information intervention designed to address vaccine hesitancy heightened its effect. We performed online studies (n = 3,181 participants) to examine vaccination intentions, which revealed patterns that diverged from those of the first randomized controlled trial; this underscores the importance of pilot-testing interventions in the field. Our findings inform the design of behavioural nudges for promoting health decisions5, and highlight the value of making vaccination easy and inducing feelings of ownership over vaccines.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 409
页数:5
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Greenwood B(2014)The contribution of vaccination to global health: past, present and future Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 369 20130433-4164
[2]  
MacDonald NE(2015)Vaccine hesitancy: definition, scope and determinants Vaccine 33 4161-207
[3]  
Brewer NT(2017)Increasing vaccination: putting psychological science into action Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 18 149-4190
[4]  
Chapman GB(2015)Strategies for addressing vaccine hesitancy – a systematic review Vaccine 33 4180-216
[5]  
Rothman AJ(2018)Nudge units to improve the delivery of health care N. Engl. J. Med. 378 214-36
[6]  
Leask J(2003)Measles outbreaks in a population with declining vaccine uptake Science 301 804-3411
[7]  
Kempe A(2002)Intention–behavior relations: a conceptual and empirical review Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 12 1-3529
[8]  
Jarrett C(2016)Getting to the top of mind: how reminders increase saving Manage. Sci. 62 3393-944
[9]  
Wilson R(2015)Psychological frictions and the incomplete take-up of social benefits: evidence from an IRS field experiment Am. Econ. Rev. 105 3489-41
[10]  
O’Leary M(2010)Procrastination of enjoyable experiences J. Mark. Res. 47 933-1496