Adoptees’ views and experiences of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomic testing: an exploratory interview study from the UK

被引:0
作者
Alison C. Kay
Nicola V. Taverner
机构
[1] University of Oxford,The MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine
[2] Cardiff University,School of Medicine
来源
Journal of Community Genetics | 2023年 / 14卷
关键词
DNA genealogy; Adoptee; Foundling; Genomics; Direct-to-consumer (DTC);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomic testing for ancestry and health may appeal to adoptees looking to fill gaps in their family information. There are only a handful of published studies on adoptees’ views and experiences of DTC testing and none of these is from the UK. The recent UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee report (GB Parliament, House of Commons 2021) did not address the gains or challenges for adopted people specifically, although the Committee did consider that robust evidence of opportunities or risks for any user of a DTC testing kit is limited. In this study presented here, semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten UK adult adoptees recruited via social media. Reflexive thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke 2006, 2019) of the interview transcripts identified three main themes: Decisional influencers of longing, uncertainty and normalisation of DNA kit use; Informational drivers to gain clarity but avoid new worrisome information; and talk around Negotiating Visibility to birth family and commercial third parties. A further theme of Meaning Making related to adoptees’ views of testing outcomes as bringing feelings of resolution or discordance. This study identified many challenging deliberations for adoptees in evaluating whether to take a DTC test and what to do when their results were returned. Additionally, adoptees’ consideration of data privacy issues appears hampered by already having shared identifying information about themselves in their wider adoptee search. Further research is encouraged.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 162
页数:13
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Aitken M(2017)Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies BMC Med Ethics 17 1-24
  • [2] Ausband L(2006)Qualitative research and quilting: advice for novice researchers The Qualitative Report 11 764-770
  • [3] Baptista NM(2016)Adopting genetics: motivations and outcomes of personal genomic testing in adult adoptees Genetic Medicine 18 924-932
  • [4] Beale B(2004)Impact of in-depth interviews on the interviewer: roller coaster ride Nurs Health Sci 6 141-147
  • [5] Cole R(2015)Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research Qual Res 15 219-234
  • [6] Hillege S(2019)Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11 589-597
  • [7] McMaster R(2006)Using thematic analysis in psychology Qual Res Psychol 3 71-101
  • [8] Berger R(2010)Genomic research and wide data sharing: views of prospective participants Genet Med 12 486-496
  • [9] Braun V(2018)Adoptee’ pursuit of genomic testing to fill gaps in family health history and reduce healthcare disparity Narrative Enquiry in Bioethics 8 131-135
  • [10] Clarke V(2008)Conceptualizing from the inside: advantages, complications, and demands on insider positionality The Qualitative Report 13 474-494