Oncoplastic level II volume displacement surgery for breast cancer: oncological and aesthetic outcomes

被引:0
作者
Marco Sparavigna
Marco Gipponi
Luca Carmisciano
Simonetta Franchelli
Giulia Atzori
Chiara Cornacchia
Raquel Diaz
Federica Murelli
Francesca Depaoli
Daniele Friedman
Piero Fregatti
机构
[1] Breast Surgery Clinic,Department of Internal Medicine
[2] San Martino Policlinic Hospital,Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), Biostatistics Unit
[3] ,Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), School of Medicine
[4] University of Genoa,undefined
[5] University of Genoa,undefined
[6] University of Genoa,undefined
来源
Updates in Surgery | 2023年 / 75卷
关键词
Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery; Breast cancer; Breast-Q; Volume displacement;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) is increasingly used to treat breast cancer with the dual purpose of performing a radical oncological resection while minimizing the risk of post-operative deformities. The aim of the study was to evaluate the patient outcomes after Level II OBCS as regards oncological safety and patient satisfaction. Between 2015 and 2020, a cohort of 109 women consecutively underwent treatment for breast cancer with bilateral oncoplastic breast-conserving volume displacement surgery; patient satisfaction was measured with BREAST-Q questionnaire. The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival were 97% (95%CI 92, 100) and 94% (95%CI 90, 99), respectively. In two patients (1.8%), mastectomy was finally performed due to margin involvement. The median patient-reported score for “satisfaction with breast” (BREAST-Q) was 74/100. Factors associated with a lower aesthetic satisfaction index included: location of tumour in central quadrant (p = 0.007); triple negative breast cancer (p = 0.045), and re-intervention (p = 0.044). OBCS represents a valid option in terms of oncological outcomes for patients otherwise candidate to more extensive breast conserving surgery; the high satisfaction index also suggests a superiority in terms of aesthetic outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1289 / 1296
页数:7
相关论文
共 231 条
  • [1] Rocco N(2021)Should oncoplastic breast conserving surgery be used for the treatment of early stage breast cancer? Using the GRADE approach for development of clinical recommendations Breast 57 25-35
  • [2] Catanuto G(2012)The changing face of mastectomy: an oncologic and cosmetic perspective Cancer Control 19 286-294
  • [3] Cinquini M(2002)Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer N Engl J Med 347 1233-1241
  • [4] Audretsch W(2002)Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer N Engl J Med 347 1227-1232
  • [5] Benson J(1998)Cosmetic sequelae after conservative treatment for breast cancer: classification and results of surgical correction Ann Plast Surg 41 471-481
  • [6] Criscitiello C(2010)Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery Ann Surg Oncol 17 1375-1391
  • [7] Di Micco R(1987)Space-holding technic and immediate reconstruction of the female breast following subcutaneous and modified radical mastectomy Arch Gynecol Obstet 241 11-19
  • [8] Kovacs T(2020)Oncoplastic Surgery in the Management of Breast Cancer J Clin Oncol 38 2246-2253
  • [9] Kuerer H(2018)Comparison of Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery and breast-conserving surgery alone: a meta-analysis J Breast Cancer 21 321-329
  • [10] Lozza L(2017)Current standards in oncoplastic breast conserving surgery Breast 34 S78-S81