Exposure to fine particles (PM2.5 and PM1) and black smoke in the general population: personal, indoor, and outdoor levels

被引:0
作者
Sandra Johannesson
Pernilla Gustafson
Peter Molnár
Lars Barregard
Gerd Sällsten
机构
[1] Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Academy at Gothenburg University,Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
来源
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology | 2007年 / 17卷
关键词
personal exposure; fine particles; PM; PM; black smoke; air pollution;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Personal exposure to PM2.5 and PM1, together with indoor and residential outdoor levels, was measured in the general adult population (30 subjects, 23–51 years of age) of Gothenburg, Sweden. Simultaneously, urban background concentrations of PM2.5 were monitored with an EPA WINS impactor. The 24-h samples were gravimetrically analyzed for mass concentration and black smoke (BS) using a smokestain reflectometer. Median levels of PM2.5 were 8.4 μg/m3 (personal), 8.6 μg/m3 (indoor), 6.4 μg/m3 (residential outdoor), and 5.6 μg/m3 (urban background). Personal exposure to PM1 was 5.4 μg/m3, while PM1 indoor and outdoor levels were 6.2 and 5.2 μg/m3, respectively. In non-smokers, personal exposure to PM2.5 was significantly higher than were residential outdoor levels. BS absorption coefficients were fairly similar for all microenvironments (0.4–0.5 10−5 m−1). Personal exposure to particulate matter (PM) and BS was well correlated with indoor levels, and there was an acceptable agreement between personal exposure and urban background concentrations for PM2.5 and BS2.5 (rs=0.61 and 0.65, respectively). PM1 made up a considerable amount (70–80%) of PM2.5 in all microenvironments. Levels of BS were higher outdoors than indoors and higher during the fall compared with spring. The correlations between particle mass and BS for both PM2.5 vs. BS2.5 and PM1versus BS1 were weak for all microenvironments including personal exposure. The urban background station provided a good estimate of residential outdoor levels of PM2.5 and BS2.5 within the city (rs=0.90 and 0.77, respectively). Outdoor levels were considerably affected by long-range transported air pollution, which was not found for personal exposure or indoor levels. The within-individual (day-to-day) variability dominated for personal exposure to both PM2.5 and BS2.5 in non-smokers.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 624
页数:11
相关论文
共 147 条
[1]  
Branis M(2005)The effect of outdoor air and indoor human activity on mass concentrations of PM Environ Res 99 143-149
[2]  
Rezacova P(2002), PM Lancet 360 1233-1242
[3]  
Domasova M(2003), and PM J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 13 134-143
[4]  
Brunekreef B(2004) in a classroom J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 14 275-283
[5]  
Holgate ST(2005)Air pollution and health Ambio 34 11-19
[6]  
Cyrys J(2002)Comparison between different traffic-related particle indicators: elemental carbon (EC), PM Environ Sci Technol 36 1191-1197
[7]  
Heinrich J(1990) mass, and absorbance Appl Occup Environ Hyg 5 46-51
[8]  
Hoek G(2004)Relationship between indoor and outdoor levels of fine particle mass, particle number concentrations and black smoke under different ventilation conditions J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 14 440-456
[9]  
Meliefste K(2000)Comparative health impact assessment of local and regional particulate air pollutants in Scandinavia J Air Waste Manag Assoc 50 1133-1143
[10]  
Lewné M(2002)Comparison of black smoke and PM Environ Health Perspect 110 539-546