No evidence for after-effects of noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation on motion perception

被引:0
|
作者
Aram Keywan
Hiba Badarna
Klaus Jahn
Max Wuehr
机构
[1] Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich,German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders
[2] University Hospital Grosshadern,undefined
[3] Schoen Clinic Bad Aibling,undefined
[4] Department of Neurology,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS) delivered at imperceptible intensities can improve vestibular function in health and disease. Here we evaluated whether nGVS effects on vestibular function are only present during active stimulation or may exhibit relevant post-stimulation after-effects. Initially, nGVS amplitudes that optimally improve posture were determined in 13 healthy subjects. Subsequently, effects of optimal nGVS amplitudes on vestibular roll-tilt direction recognition thresholds (DRT) were examined during active and sham nGVS. Ten of 13 subjects exhibited reduced DRTs during active nGVS compared to sham stimulation (p < 0.001). These 10 participants were then administered to 30 mins of active nGVS treatment while being allowed to move freely. Immediately post-treatment , DRTs were increased again (p = 0.044), reverting to baseline threshold levels (i.e. were comparable to the sham nGVS thresholds), and remained stable in a follow-up assessment after 30 min. After three weeks, participants returned for a follow-up experiment to control for learning effects, in which DRTs were measured during and immediately after 30 min application of sham nGVS. DRTs during both assessments did not differ from baseline level. These findings indicate that nGVS does not induce distinct post-stimulation effects on vestibular motion perception and favor the development of a wearable technology that continuously delivers nGVS to patients in order to enhance vestibular function.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] No evidence for after-effects of noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation on motion perception
    Keywan, Aram
    Badarna, Hiba
    Jahn, Klaus
    Wuehr, Max
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [2] Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Primarily Affects Otolith-Mediated Motion Perception
    Keywan, Aram
    Jahn, Klaus
    Wuehr, Max
    NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 399 : 161 - 166
  • [3] Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation improves vestibular perception in bilateral vestibulopathy
    Max Wuehr
    Josefine Eder
    Aram Keywan
    Klaus Jahn
    Journal of Neurology, 2023, 270 : 938 - 943
  • [4] Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation improves vestibular perception in bilateral vestibulopathy
    Wuehr, Max
    Eder, Josefine
    Keywan, Aram
    Jahn, Klaus
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2023, 270 (02) : 938 - 943
  • [5] Visual motion perception by DC galvanic vestibular stimulation
    Yamashita Y.
    Ishii M.
    Kyokai Joho Imeji Zasshi/Journal of the Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers, 2011, 65 (06): : 816 - 820
  • [6] Effects of Different Stimulation Conditions on the Stimulation Effect of Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation
    Inukai, Yasuto
    Miyaguchi, Shota
    Saito, Miki
    Otsuru, Naofumi
    Onishi, Hideaki
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 14
  • [7] Verticality perception during and after galvanic vestibular stimulation
    Volkening, Katharina
    Bergmann, Jeannine
    Keller, Ingo
    Wuehr, Max
    Mueller, Friedemann
    Jahn, Klaus
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2014, 581 : 75 - 79
  • [8] Effects of noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation on functional reach test
    Takahashi, Hirona
    Inukai, Yasuto
    Miyaguchi, Shota
    Otsuru, Naofumi
    Kawakami, Saki
    Onishi, Hideaki
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2023, 810
  • [9] Noisy Galvanic Stimulation Improves Roll-Tilt Vestibular Perception in Healthy Subjects
    Keywan, Aram
    Wuehr, Max
    Pradhan, Cauchy
    Jahn, Klaus
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [10] The Effects of Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation and Vision on Perception of Ground Inclination
    Maeda, Tomohiro
    Suzuki, Aya
    Krebs, Hermano Igo
    2016 6TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ROBOTICS AND BIOMECHATRONICS (BIOROB), 2016, : 1019 - 1022