Objectification, Masculinity, and Muscularity: A Test of Objectification Theory with Heterosexual Men

被引:0
|
作者
Christopher M. Davids
Laurel B. Watson
Madeline P. Gere
机构
[1] Westminster College,Department of Psychology
[2] University of Missouri-Kansas City,Department of Counseling & Educational Psychology
来源
Sex Roles | 2019年 / 80卷
关键词
Objectification theory; Gender role conflict; Drive for muscularity; Masculinity; Heterosexual men;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objectification theory is increasingly used to explain the body image-related experiences of men because research indicates that men are at heightened risk for body image concerns because of sociocultural messages regarding appearance of the male body. Although researchers have explored body image concerns among men, it is important to understand various sociocultural correlates relating to their body image disturbances. Therefore, we introduced gender role conflict in the present study to better explain their drive for muscularity. Based on data from 473 heterosexual men in the United States, the proposed model demonstrated excellent data fit, although several of the paths were non-significant, suggesting mixed support for the utility of objectification theory in the context of men’s body image. Specifically, sexual objectification experiences did not uniquely predict self-objectification and body surveillance—key internalizing variables in the objectification theory framework—and these variables had multiple non-significant relationships with additional hypothesized variables. However, gender role conflict was significantly related to objectification theory variables, suggesting the importance of attending to this variable when understanding heterosexual men’s body image disturbances. A more parsimonious model—with non-significant paths removed—was also explored and demonstrated excellent data fit. Limitations, future areas of research, and practice implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 457
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Threatened masculinity and muscularity: An experimental examination of multiple aspects of muscularity in men
    Hunt, Christopher John
    Gonsalkorale, Karen
    Murray, Stuart B.
    BODY IMAGE, 2013, 10 (03) : 290 - 299
  • [22] Examining an integrated sociocultural and objectification model of thinness- and muscularity-oriented disordered eating in Chinese older men and women
    Barnhart, Wesley R. R.
    Cui, Tianxiang
    Zhang, Hengyue
    Cui, Shuqi
    Zhao, Yiqing
    Lu, Yining
    He, Jinbo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS, 2023, 56 (10) : 1875 - 1886
  • [23] Compliance with COVID-19 safety measures: A test of an objectification theory model
    Earle, Megan
    Prusaczyk, Elvira
    Choma, Becky
    Calogero, Rachel
    BODY IMAGE, 2021, 37 : 6 - 13
  • [24] Objectification Processes and Disordered Eating in British Women and Men
    Calogero, Rachel M.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 14 (03) : 394 - 402
  • [25] The effects of objectification on stereotypical perception and attractiveness of women and men
    Rollero, Chiara
    Tartaglia, Stefano
    PSIHOLOGIJA, 2016, 49 (03) : 231 - 243
  • [26] Assessing and understanding body image and body satisfaction in gay and bisexual men through objectification theory
    Simpson, Brandon
    SEXUAL AND RELATIONSHIP THERAPY, 2024, 39 (02) : 598 - 610
  • [27] The Drive for Muscularity and Disordered Eating Among Heterosexual and Sexual Minority Men in Israel
    Spivak-Lavi, Zohar
    Gewirtz-Meydan, Ateret
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPSYCHIATRY, 2024,
  • [29] A Test and Extension of Objectification Theory as It Predicts Disordered Eating: Does Women's Age Matter?
    Augustus-Horvath, Casey L.
    Tylka, Tracy L.
    JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 56 (02) : 253 - 265
  • [30] Moving Beyond the Binary With Disordered Eating Research: A Test and Extension of Objectification Theory With Bisexual Women
    Brewster, Melanie E.
    Velez, Brandon L.
    Esposito, Jessica
    Wong, Stephanie
    Geiger, Elizabeth
    Keum, TaeHyuk Brian
    JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 61 (01) : 50 - 62