Ultrafiltration and microfiltration membrane performance, cleaning, and flux recovery for microalgal harvesting

被引:0
|
作者
Rui Liu
Lan Wang
Li Yang
Qingling Liu
Yunxiao Gao
Jing Ye
Jingrong Xiao
Qiang Hu
Xuezhi Zhang
机构
[1] Chinese Academy of Sciences,Center for Microalgal Biotechnology and Biofuels, Institute of Hydrobiology
[2] Chinese Academy of Sciences,Key Laboratory for Algal Biology, Institute of Hydrobiology
[3] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology
[4] Chinese Academy of Sciences,The Innovative Academy of Seed Design
[5] Chinese Academy of Science,Microalgae Biotechnology Center
[6] SDIC Biotech Investment Co.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Algae Biomass
[7] LTD.,undefined
[8] State Development & Investment Corp,undefined
[9] SDIC Biotech Investment Corporation,undefined
来源
关键词
Ultrafiltration; Microfiltration; Membrane harvesting; Fouling index; Chemical cleaning; Flux recovery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Membrane material, pore size, and cleaning strategy are important factors for microalgal membrane harvesting. In this study, harvesting of Scenedesmus acuminatus cultivated in pilot scale using nine ultrafiltration and three microfiltration membranes was carried out in cross-flow filtration system to compare their filtration performance and flux recovery after physical and chemical cleaning. The 0.45-μm PVDF-AsahiKASEI membrane had the highest average flux of 513.6 L m−2 h−1 among 12 membranes and 50-kDa PVC-Litree membrane had the highest average flux of 98.0 L m−2 h−1 among nine ultrafiltration membranes for 60 L S. acuminatus suspension harvesting. There were significantly positive correlations between membrane pore size, pure water flux, and average flux for S. acuminatus suspension harvesting. Generally, ultrafiltration membrane had moderate total fouling index (TFI) and high proportion of hydraulic reversible fouling index (HRFI) of more than 95%. The 0.45-μm PVDF-AsahiKASEI membrane had a low TFI but the lowest proportion of HRFI, associated with the residual microalgal cells, debris, and colloids on the inner surface and top ends of some cells inserted to big membrane pores, demonstrated by SEM image and reduced porosity from 65.9 to 60.2%. Compared to soaking cleaning, circulation cleaning strategy had a better flux recovery efficiency for 0.45-μm PVDF-AsahiKASEI membrane, proving that it would be a potential way in membrane chemical cleaning. This study demonstrated that microfiltration with high flux has great potential in microalgal harvesting if flux recovery efficiency can be significantly increased using suitable cleaning strategy such as circulation cleaning strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:3101 / 3112
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An hydrodynamic investigation of microfiltration and ultrafiltration in a vibrating membrane module
    Al Akoum, O
    Jaffrin, MY
    Ding, LH
    Paullier, P
    Vanhoutte, C
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2002, 197 (1-2) : 37 - 52
  • [32] Membrane Fouling in Microfiltration used for Cell Harvesting
    Tahereh Kaghazchi
    JournalofThermalScience, 2001, (01) : 32 - 37
  • [33] Membrane fouling in microfiltration used for cell harvesting
    Kaghazchi T.
    Zokaee F.
    Zare A.
    Journal of Thermal Science, 2001, 10 (1) : 32 - 37
  • [34] Experimental study of ultrafiltration membrane fouling by sodium alginate and flux recovery by backwashing
    Katsoufidou, K.
    Yiantsios, S. G.
    Karabelas, A. J.
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2007, 300 (1-2) : 137 - 146
  • [35] Recovery of liquid CO2 from cleaning solutions without phase change using ultrafiltration and microfiltration membranes
    Photinon, K
    Boddu, A
    Ilias, S
    SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 38 (12-13) : 2951 - 2962
  • [36] Protein and water recovery from poultry processing wastewater integrating microfiltration, ultrafiltration and vacuum membrane distillation
    W. Białas
    J. Stangierski
    P. Konieczny
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2015, 12 : 1875 - 1888
  • [37] Protein and water recovery from poultry processing wastewater integrating microfiltration, ultrafiltration and vacuum membrane distillation
    Biaas, W.
    Stangierski, J.
    Konieczny, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 12 (06) : 1875 - 1888
  • [38] The effect of multiple fouling and cleaning cycles on a tubular ceramic microfiltration membrane fouled with a whey protein concentrate -: Membrane performance and cleaning efficiency
    Blanpain-Avet, P
    Migdal, JF
    Bénézech, T
    FOOD AND BIOPRODUCTS PROCESSING, 2004, 82 (C3) : 231 - 243
  • [39] Relating membrane surface properties and flux recovery during the chemical cleaning of forward osmosis membrane
    Ruengruehan, Kaiwit
    Fagkaew, Pattarasiri
    Ahn, Gwangtaek
    Kang, Seoktae
    Ko, Seok-Oh
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2016, 57 (55) : 26621 - 26628
  • [40] Cleaning Optimization of Microfiltration Membrane Employed for Milk Sterilization
    Madaeni, S. S.
    Tavakolian, H. R.
    Rahimpour, F.
    SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 46 (04) : 571 - 580