Ultrafiltration and microfiltration membrane performance, cleaning, and flux recovery for microalgal harvesting

被引:0
|
作者
Rui Liu
Lan Wang
Li Yang
Qingling Liu
Yunxiao Gao
Jing Ye
Jingrong Xiao
Qiang Hu
Xuezhi Zhang
机构
[1] Chinese Academy of Sciences,Center for Microalgal Biotechnology and Biofuels, Institute of Hydrobiology
[2] Chinese Academy of Sciences,Key Laboratory for Algal Biology, Institute of Hydrobiology
[3] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology
[4] Chinese Academy of Sciences,The Innovative Academy of Seed Design
[5] Chinese Academy of Science,Microalgae Biotechnology Center
[6] SDIC Biotech Investment Co.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Algae Biomass
[7] LTD.,undefined
[8] State Development & Investment Corp,undefined
[9] SDIC Biotech Investment Corporation,undefined
来源
关键词
Ultrafiltration; Microfiltration; Membrane harvesting; Fouling index; Chemical cleaning; Flux recovery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Membrane material, pore size, and cleaning strategy are important factors for microalgal membrane harvesting. In this study, harvesting of Scenedesmus acuminatus cultivated in pilot scale using nine ultrafiltration and three microfiltration membranes was carried out in cross-flow filtration system to compare their filtration performance and flux recovery after physical and chemical cleaning. The 0.45-μm PVDF-AsahiKASEI membrane had the highest average flux of 513.6 L m−2 h−1 among 12 membranes and 50-kDa PVC-Litree membrane had the highest average flux of 98.0 L m−2 h−1 among nine ultrafiltration membranes for 60 L S. acuminatus suspension harvesting. There were significantly positive correlations between membrane pore size, pure water flux, and average flux for S. acuminatus suspension harvesting. Generally, ultrafiltration membrane had moderate total fouling index (TFI) and high proportion of hydraulic reversible fouling index (HRFI) of more than 95%. The 0.45-μm PVDF-AsahiKASEI membrane had a low TFI but the lowest proportion of HRFI, associated with the residual microalgal cells, debris, and colloids on the inner surface and top ends of some cells inserted to big membrane pores, demonstrated by SEM image and reduced porosity from 65.9 to 60.2%. Compared to soaking cleaning, circulation cleaning strategy had a better flux recovery efficiency for 0.45-μm PVDF-AsahiKASEI membrane, proving that it would be a potential way in membrane chemical cleaning. This study demonstrated that microfiltration with high flux has great potential in microalgal harvesting if flux recovery efficiency can be significantly increased using suitable cleaning strategy such as circulation cleaning strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:3101 / 3112
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrafiltration and microfiltration membrane performance, cleaning, and flux recovery for microalgal harvesting
    Liu, Rui
    Wang, Lan
    Yang, Li
    Liu, Qingling
    Gao, Yunxiao
    Ye, Jing
    Xiao, Jingrong
    Hu, Qiang
    Zhang, Xuezhi
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY, 2020, 32 (05) : 3101 - 3112
  • [2] Membrane fouling and cleaning strategies in microfiltration/ultrafiltration and dynamic membrane
    Xiao, Ting
    Zhu, Zehua
    Li, Lucheng
    Shi, Jingxin
    Li, Zhenxuan
    Zuo, Xiaojun
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 318
  • [3] Cleaning strategies for flux recovery of an ultrafiltration membrane fouled by natural organic matter
    Lee, H
    Amy, G
    Cho, JW
    Yoon, YM
    Moon, SH
    Kim, IS
    WATER RESEARCH, 2001, 35 (14) : 3301 - 3308
  • [4] Automated electrophoretic membrane cleaning for dead-end microfiltration and ultrafiltration
    Ahmad, AL
    Ibrahim, N
    Bowen, WR
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 29 (02) : 105 - 112
  • [5] Chemical cleaning of a cross-flow microfiltration membrane fouled by microalgal biomass
    Ahmad, A. L.
    Yasin, N. H. Mat
    Derek, C. J. C.
    Lim, J. K.
    JOURNAL OF THE TAIWAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS, 2014, 45 (01) : 233 - 241
  • [6] Comparison of microfiltration and ultrafiltration for algae harvesting
    Sun, X. F.
    Wang, C. W.
    Tong, Y. J.
    Wang, W. G.
    Wei, J.
    EUROMEMBRANE CONFERENCE 2012, 2012, 44 : 2108 - 2111
  • [7] Flux decline in crossflow microfiltration and ultrafiltration: mechanisms and modeling of membrane fouling
    Song, LF
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1998, 139 (02) : 183 - 200
  • [8] Evaluation of critical flux and cleaning efficiency for electrospun nanofiber microfiltration membrane
    Ko, Younghoon
    Choi, Yongjun
    Jang, Youngsun
    Choi, Jihyeok
    Lee, Sangho
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2017, 97 : 87 - 93
  • [9] Flux decline and membrane cleaning in cross-flow ultrafiltration of treated fermentation broths for surfactin recovery
    Chen, Huei-Li
    Chen, Ying-Shr
    Juang, Ruey-Shin
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 62 (01) : 47 - 55
  • [10] MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY - MICROFILTRATION AND ULTRAFILTRATION
    MEIRELES, M
    AIMAR, P
    SANCHEZ, V
    BIOFUTUR, 1992, (111) : S1 - +