Using Instrumental Variables to Account for Selection Effects in Research on First-Year Programs

被引:0
作者
Gary R. Pike
Michele J. Hansen
Ching-Hui Lin
机构
[1] Indiana University-Purdue University-Indianapolis,Information Management & Institutional Research
[2] Indiana University Bloomington,undefined
来源
Research in Higher Education | 2011年 / 52卷
关键词
First-year programs; Self selection; Grades; Instrumental variables; Learning communities;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The widespread popularity of programs for first-year students is due, in large part, to studies showing that participation in first-year programs is significantly related to students’ academic success. Because students choose to participate in first-year programs, self-selection effects prevent researchers from making causal claims about the outcomes of those programs. The present research examined the effects on first-semester grades of students participating in themed learning communities at a research university in the Midwest. Results indicated that membership in themed learning communities was positively associated with higher grade point averages, even after controlling for entering ability, application date, gender, and first-generation/low-income status. However, when instrumental variables were introduced to account for self-selection, the effects of themed learning communities on grades were not statistically significant. The results have implications for campus leaders and assessment practitioners who are working to develop methods for understanding the effects of programs designed to enhance the undergraduate educational experiences on their campuses.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 214
页数:20
相关论文
共 88 条
[11]  
Pagan AR(1997)Minority and nonminority adjustment to college: Differences or similarities? Research in Higher Education 38 77-97
[12]  
Cellini SR(2001)Identification and estimation of treatment effects with a regression-discontinuity design Econometrica 69 201-209
[13]  
Chism LP(2005)Assessing learning communities at Indiana University-Purdue University in Indianapolis: Comprehensive approaches, leveraging results, lessons learned, and remaining challenges Metropolitan Universities Journal 16 69-90
[14]  
Baker SS(2007)Living-learning programs and first-generation college students’ academic and social transition to college Research in Higher Education 48 403-434
[15]  
Hansen MJ(2003)Different by design: An examination of student outcomes among participants in three types of living-learning programs Journal of College Student Development 44 335-368
[16]  
Williams G(2003)A longitudinal approach to assessing attrition behavior among first-generation students: Time-varying effects of pre-college characteristics Research in Higher Education 44 433-449
[17]  
Cook TD(1999)Higher education residential learning communities: What are the implications for student success? College Student Journal 33 385-399
[18]  
Shadish WR(2003)Learning communities and first-year programs: Lessons for planners Planning for Higher Education 31 5-12
[19]  
Cook RD(1980)Factors affecting the performance and satisfaction of adult men and women attending college Research in Higher Education 13 115-130
[20]  
Weisberg S(1984)Predicting college academic achievement: A research review College Student Journal 18 380-386