Using Instrumental Variables to Account for Selection Effects in Research on First-Year Programs

被引:0
作者
Gary R. Pike
Michele J. Hansen
Ching-Hui Lin
机构
[1] Indiana University-Purdue University-Indianapolis,Information Management & Institutional Research
[2] Indiana University Bloomington,undefined
来源
Research in Higher Education | 2011年 / 52卷
关键词
First-year programs; Self selection; Grades; Instrumental variables; Learning communities;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The widespread popularity of programs for first-year students is due, in large part, to studies showing that participation in first-year programs is significantly related to students’ academic success. Because students choose to participate in first-year programs, self-selection effects prevent researchers from making causal claims about the outcomes of those programs. The present research examined the effects on first-semester grades of students participating in themed learning communities at a research university in the Midwest. Results indicated that membership in themed learning communities was positively associated with higher grade point averages, even after controlling for entering ability, application date, gender, and first-generation/low-income status. However, when instrumental variables were introduced to account for self-selection, the effects of themed learning communities on grades were not statistically significant. The results have implications for campus leaders and assessment practitioners who are working to develop methods for understanding the effects of programs designed to enhance the undergraduate educational experiences on their campuses.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 214
页数:20
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Angrist JD(1996)Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 444-455
[2]  
Imbens GW(1985)Do grades and tests predict adult accomplishment? Research in Higher Education 21 261-278
[3]  
Rubin DB(2000)Impact of learning communities on retention at a metropolitan university Journal of College Student Retention 2 115-126
[4]  
Baird LL(1995)Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak Journal of the American Statistical Association 90 443-450
[5]  
Baker S(1979)A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation Econometrica 47 1287-1294
[6]  
Pomerantz N(2008)Causal inference and omitted variable bias in financial aid research: Assessing solutions Review of Higher Education 31 329-354
[7]  
Bound J(2008)Implementation of first-year seminars, the summer academy bridge program, and themed learning communities Metropolitan Universities 19 8-17
[8]  
Jaeger DA(1994)Social experiments: Some developments over the past fifteen years Annual Review of Psychology 45 545-580
[9]  
Baker RM(1983)Diagnostics for heteroscedasticity in regression Biometrika 70 1-10
[10]  
Breusch TS(2002)Adding a timing light to the “Tool Box” Research in Higher Education 43 83-114