Genotype by environment interactions (GEIs) for barley grain yield under salt stress condition

被引:11
作者
Elakhdar A. [1 ,2 ]
Kumamaru T. [2 ]
Smith K.P. [3 ]
Brueggeman R.S. [4 ]
Capo-chichi L.J.A. [5 ]
Solanki S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Field Crop Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, 9 Gama St., Giza
[2] Institute of plant Genetic Resources, Kyushu University, Hakozaki 6-10-1, Fukuoka
[3] Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul
[4] Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, 58108, ND
[5] Ludovic J.A. Capo-chichi, InnoTech Alberta Inc., Highway 16A & 75 Street, Vegreville, T9C 1T4, AB
关键词
AMMI; G × E interaction; Hordeum vulgare; salt stress; Tai’s stability parameters;
D O I
10.1007/s12892-017-0016-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Changes in the relative genetic performance of genotypes across environments are referred to as genotype × environment interactions (GEIs). GEIs can affect barley breeding improvement for salt tolerance because it often complicates the evaluation and selection of superior genotypes. The present study evaluated the GEIs over 60 barley genotypes for yield components and grain yield in six salinity environments in North Delta, Egypt. Data were analyzed using the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) and Tai’s stability parameters. GEIs effects on yield explained 20.3, 20.1, 14.6, and 33.0% of the total variation besides, the first two principal components account for 67.3, 56.3, 64.3, and 83.7% of the explained variance in the four sets, respectively. Six genotypes namely G-4, G-7, G-20, G-34, G-36, and G-39 were found to be most stable and high yielding across environments (GY >2.00 t ha-1), and located close to zero projection onto the AEC ordinate. Tai’s stability parameters demonstrated that these genotypes were more responsive to the environmental changes. The genotypes G-50 and G-53 showed perfect/static stability (α = -0.95, -0.91, respectively). In contrast, the genotype; G-36 had α = 0 and λ = 1.10, indicating parallel with the environmental effects followed by G-44. Overall, we found that GEIs for grain yield are highly significant in all sets, suggesting that responded differently across environments. This interaction may be a result of changes in genotypes’ relative performance across environments, due to their differential responses to various abiotic factors. © 2017, Korean Society of Crop Science and Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 204
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Balestre M.V., Pinho R.G., Souza J.C., Oliveira R.L., Genotypic stability and adaptability in tropical maize based on AMMI and GGE biplot analysis. Genet, Mol. Res., 8, pp. 1311-1322, (2009)
[2]  
Ceccarelli S., Positive interpretation of genotype by environment interactions in relation to sustainability and biodiversity, Plant adaptation and crop improvement, pp. 467-486, (1996)
[3]  
Cooper M., Byth D.E., Understanding plant adaptation to achieve systematic applied crop improvement - A fundamental challenge, Plant adaptation and crop improvem ent, pp. 5-23, (1996)
[4]  
Dehghani H., Ebadi A., Yousefi A., Biplot analysis of genotype by environment interaction for barley yield in Iran, Agron. J., 98, pp. 388-393, (2006)
[5]  
Demissew A., Hussein S., Derera J., Genotype-by-environment interaction and yield stability of quality protein maize hybrids developed from tropicalhighland adapted inbred lines, Euphytica, 209, pp. 757-769, (2016)
[6]  
Elakhdar A.A., El-Sattar M., Amer K., Kumamaru T., Genetic diversity and association analysis among Egyptian barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes with different adaptations to saline conditions analyzed by SSR markers, AJCS, 10, pp. 637-645, (2016)
[7]  
Elakhdar A., Abdelsattar M., Amer K., Assma R., Kumamaru T., Population structure and marker-trait association of salt tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), C. R. Biologies, 339, pp. 454-461, (2016)
[8]  
Land and plant nutrition management service, (2015)
[9]  
Finlay K., Wilkinson G., The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme, Aust. J. Agric. Res., 14, pp. 742-754, (1963)
[10]  
Garcia del Moral L., Miralles D.J., Slafer G.A., Barley Physiology: Phasic and foliar development, Barley Science: recent advances from molecular biology to agronomy of yield and quality, (2002)