Developing an adaptive tool to select, plan, and scaffold oral assessment tasks for undergraduate courses

被引:0
作者
Carrie Demmans Epp
Gina Park
Christopher Plumb
机构
[1] University of Toronto,Department of Computer Science
[2] University of Toronto,Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE)
[3] Abu Dhabi National Oil Company Technical Institute,undefined
来源
Educational Technology Research and Development | 2015年 / 63卷
关键词
Assessment; Planning; Ethics; Undergraduates; Teaching practices; Adaptive instructional tools;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The increased linguistic and cultural diversity of undergraduate classrooms at English language institutions has imposed additional pedagogical and assessment challenges on instructors, many of whom lack the knowledge necessary to design classroom activities and assessments that are fair to all students regardless of students’ background and language abilities. The development of an adaptive instrument for instructors who do not specialize in English language learning represents an attempt to adjust instructional practices to meet this need. This paper reports on the development of an instrument that undergraduate instructors can use to plan their courses at universities where English is the language of instruction. The instrument’s intended use is illustrated through an example that involves the planning of an interdisciplinary undergraduate course. To build this adaptive tool, a taxonomy that describes the relevant components of assessments that involve oral communication was developed and externally reviewed. The questions used in the instrument were then developed and piloted with a group of university undergraduate instructors; after which, the instrument was further refined. Although piloting revealed an increase in instructor awareness of how language abilities relate to assessment, further research is needed to determine the extent to which this tool affects instructor’s classroom or assessment practices.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 498
页数:23
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Al-Issa AS(2010)Taking the floor: Oral presentations in EFL classrooms TESOL Journal 1 227-246
[2]  
Al-Qubtan R(2011)Understanding discrepancies in rater judgement on national-level oral examination tasks RELC Journal 42 31-51
[3]  
Ang-Aw H(2012)Improving online social presence through asynchronous video Internet and Higher Education 15 195-203
[4]  
Chuen Meng Goh C(2008)Testing-context analysis: Assessment is just another part of language curriculum development Language Assessment Quarterly 5 275-312
[5]  
Borup J(2010)Does an argument-based approach to validity make a difference? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 29 3-13
[6]  
West RE(2007)The challenges of the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test for second language students Language Testing 24 185-208
[7]  
Graham CR(1999)The english language entry requirements of Australian universities for students of non-english speaking background Higher Education Research & Development 18 7-17
[8]  
Brown JD(2010)Examination preparation or effective teaching: Conflicting priorities in the implementation of a pedagogic innovation Language Assessment Quarterly 7 285-302
[9]  
Chapelle CA(2011)Investigating the validity of an integrated listening-speaking task: A discourse-based analysis of test takers’ oral performances Language Testing 29 345-369
[10]  
Enright M(2003)Task difficulty in speaking tests Language Testing 20 321-344