Risk mechanisms of large group emergency decision-making based on multi-agent simulation

被引:0
作者
Xuanpeng Yin
Xuanhua Xu
Xiaohong Chen
机构
[1] Central South University,School of Business
来源
Natural Hazards | 2020年 / 103卷
关键词
Large group; Emergency decision-making; Risk cause; Multi-agent simulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There are many critical sources of risk in large group emergency decision-making. In this paper, we systematically identify individual and group sources of risk in large group emergency decision-making and explore the relationship between each risk factor and two group effects, namely cognitive conflict and relationship conflict. Based on this analysis, we model a large group emergency decision-making risk-causing system. The model allows examination of the effect of key risk factors. These variables include individual acceptance, group structure, interaction mode, decision strategy, and decision-making environment, and variable values are set. A multi-agent simulation model of large group emergency decision-making risk-causing is developed using the Netlogo tool based on opinion dynamics. Through case simulation, we obtain the generalization rule of the causal mechanisms for each risk factor. The simulation shows that controlling the proportion of highly accepted decision-making subjects, increasing the interaction between clusters, and taking necessary anticipatory measures can noticeably reduce decision-making risks and help large teams function in highly dynamic decision-making environments. By highlighting the composition and collective influence of risk factors in large group emergency decision-making, this research offers reference and guidance for strategy selection in emergency decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:1009 / 1034
页数:25
相关论文
共 168 条
  • [1] Acemoglu D(2011)Opinion dynamics and learning in social networks Dyn Games Appl 1 3-49
  • [2] Ozdaglar A(2003)Using Brunswikian theory and a longitudinal design to study how hierarchical teams adapt to increasing levels of time pressure Acta Psychol 112 181-206
  • [3] Adelman L(2013)Do you see what I see? The effect of members' cognitive styles on team processes and errors in task execution Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 122 92-99
  • [4] Miller SL(2019)Building traits for organizational resilience through balancing organizational structures Scand J Manag 35 36-45
  • [5] Henderson D(2012)Risk preferences are not time preferences Am Econ Rev 102 3357-3376
  • [6] Schoelles M(2012)To cooperate or not to cooperate: using new methodologies and frameworks to understand how affiliation influences cooperation in the present and future J Econ Psychol 33 842-853
  • [7] Aggarwal I(2004)The effects of variability and expectations on utilization of member expertise and group performance Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 93 89-101
  • [8] Woolley AW(2004)Expertise in group problem solving: recognition, social combination, and performance Group Dyn Theor Res 8 277-290
  • [9] Andersson T(2017)Collective decision-making Curr Opin Behav Sci 16 30-34
  • [10] Cäker M(2006)The development of risk-taking: a multi-perspective review Dev Rev 26 291-345