Kentucky Health Access Nurturing Development Services Home Visiting Program Improves Maternal and Child Health

被引:0
作者
Corrine M. Williams
Sarah Cprek
Ibitola Asaolu
Brenda English
Tracey Jewell
Kylen Smith
Joyce Robl
机构
[1] University of Kentucky,Department of Health, Behavior & Society
[2] Kentucky Department for Public Health,undefined
来源
Maternal and Child Health Journal | 2017年 / 21卷
关键词
Home visiting; Child health; Development; Preterm birth; Low birth weight; Child maltreatment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives: Home visitation programs are one of the numerous efforts to help reduce the rates of preterm birth and low birth weight as well as offering other improvements in maternal and child health and development. The Kentucky Health Access Nurturing Development Services (HANDS) is a voluntary, home visiting program serving first-time, high-risk mothers. This study’s objective was to evaluate the impact of HANDS on maternal and child health outcomes. Methods: HANDS administrative data, live birth certificate records and data from the Division of Child Protection and Safety were used in these analyses. We analyzed 2253 mothers who were referred to HANDS between July 2011 and June 2012 and received a minimum of one prenatal home visit (mean number of prenatal visits = 12.9) compared to a demographically similar group of women (n = 2253) who did not receive a visit. Chi square statistics and conditional logistic regression models were used to evaluate the impact of HANDS. Results: HANDS participants had lower rates of preterm delivery (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61–0.88) and low birth weight infants (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.44–0.67). HANDS participants also were significantly less likely to have a substantiated report of child maltreatment compared to controls (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.43–0.65). HANDS participants also had an increase in adequate prenatal care and a reduction in maternal complications during pregnancy. Of particular important, outcomes improved as the number of prenatal home visits increased: among women receiving 1–3 prenatal home visits was 12.1%, the rate among women receiving 4–6 prenatal home visits was 13.2%, while the rate of PTB among those receiving 7 or more prenatal home visits was 9.4%. Conclusions: HANDS program participation appears to result in significant improvements in maternal and child health outcomes, most specifically for those receiving seven or more prenatal home visits. As a state-wide, large scale home visiting program, this has significant implications for the continued improvement of maternal and child health outcomes in Kentucky.
引用
收藏
页码:1166 / 1174
页数:8
相关论文
共 116 条
  • [1] Bill DE(2009)Healthy Start Programa Madrina: A Promotora Home Visiting Outreach and Education Program to Improve Perinatal Health Among Latina Pregnant Women Health Educator 41 68-76
  • [2] Hock-Long L(2013)Pregnancy and birth outcome improvements for American Indians in the Healthy Start Project of the Inter-Tribal Council of Michigan, 1998–2008 Maternal and Child Health Journal 17 1005-1015
  • [3] Mesure M(2007)Health and safety intervention with first-time mothers Health Education Research 22 285-294
  • [4] Bryer P(2007)Impact of a statewide home visiting program to prevent child abuse Child abuse & neglect 31 801-827
  • [5] Zambrano N(2004)Randomized trial of a statewide home visiting program: impact in preventing child abuse and neglect Child Abuse & Neglect 28 597-622
  • [6] Coughlin RL(2008)Healthy Families New York (HFNY) randomized trial: Effects on early child abuse and neglect Child abuse & neglect 32 295-315
  • [7] Kushman EK(2013)Breastfeeding and complementary food: randomized trial of community doula home visiting Pediatrics 132 S160-S166
  • [8] Copeland GE(2013)Dosage effect of prenatal home visiting on pregnancy outcomes in at-risk, first-time mothers Pediatrics 132 S118-S125
  • [9] Wilson ML(2009)The role of preschool home-visiting programs in improving children’s developmental and health outcomes Pediatrics 123 598-603
  • [10] Culp AM(2014)Contributors to excess infant mortality in the U.S. south American Journal of Preventive Medicine 46 219-227