Criteria for item selection for a preference-based measure for use in economic evaluation

被引:0
作者
Tessa Peasgood
Clara Mukuria
Jill Carlton
Janice Connell
John Brazier
机构
[1] School of Health and Related Research,
[2] University of Sheffield,undefined
[3] Melbourne School of Population and Global Health,undefined
[4] University of Melbourne,undefined
来源
Quality of Life Research | 2021年 / 30卷
关键词
PROMs; Item selection; Question selection; Preference-based measures; Quality of life; Utility;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Preference-based measures allow patients to report their level of health, and the responses are then scored using preference weights from a representative general population sample for use in cost utility analysis. The development process of new preference-based measures should ensure that valid items are selected to reflect the constructs of interest included in the measure and that are suitable for use in preference-elicitation exercises. Existing criteria on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) development were reviewed, and additional considerations were taken into account in order to generate criteria to support development of new preference-based measures. Criteria covering 22 different aspects related to item selection for preference-based measures are presented. These include criteria related to how items are phrased to ensure accurate completion, the coverage of items in terms of range of domains as well as focus on current outcomes and whether items are suitable for valuation. The criteria are aimed at supporting the development of new preference-based measures with discussion to ensure that even where there is conflict between criteria, issues have been considered at the item selection stage. This would minimize problems at valuation stage by harmonizing established criteria and expanding lists to reflect the unique characteristics of preference-based measures.
引用
收藏
页码:1425 / 1432
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Yang Y(2009)Estimating a preference-based single index from the overactive bladder questionnaire Value in Health 12 159-166
[2]  
Keetharuth AD(2018)Recovering quality of life (ReQoL): A new generic self-reported outcome measure for use with people experiencing mental health difficulties The British Journal of Psychiatry 212 42-49
[3]  
Patrick DL(2007)Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective Value in Health 10 S125-S137
[4]  
Brazier J(2002)The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 Journal of Health Economics 21 271-292
[5]  
Roberts J(2019)Manipulating the 5 dimensions of the EuroQol instrument: The effects on self-reporting actual health and valuing hypothetical health states Medical Decision Making 39 380-392
[6]  
Deverill M(1984)Social desirability and survey Surveying Subjective Phenomena 2 257-S9
[7]  
Tsuchiya A(2009)QALYs: The basics Value in Health 12 S5-42
[8]  
DeMaio TJ(2007)Differential item functioning and health assessment Quality of Life Research 16 33-74
[9]  
Weinstein MC(2003)Differential item functioning results may change depending on how an item is scored: An illustration with the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale Educational and Psychological Measurement 63 65-96
[10]  
Torrance G(2014)Validity and reliability of the assessment of quality of life (AQoL)-8D multi-attribute utility instrument The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 7 85-747