Emergy Evaluation of the Natural Value of Water Resources in Chinese Rivers

被引:0
作者
Dan Chen
Jing Chen
Zhaohui Luo
Zhuwu Lv
机构
[1] Hohai University,College of Agricultural Engineering
[2] University of Yamanashi,Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine and Engineering, Department of Natural, Biotic and Social Environment Engineering
[3] Yiwu City Water Resources Bureau,undefined
来源
Environmental Management | 2009年 / 44卷
关键词
Emergy; Evaluate; Water resources; Value; Rivers;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Emergy theory and method were used to evaluate the economy of China and the contributions of water resources in Chinese rivers to the real wealth of the Chinese economy. The water cycle and energy conversion were reviewed, and an emergy method for evaluating the natural value of water resources in a river watershed was developed. The indices for China calculated from the emergy evaluation were close to those of developing countries. Despite a small surplus in its balance of payments, China had a net emergy loss from its trade in 2002. The efficiency of Chinese natural resource use was still not high and did not match its economic growth rate. Furthermore, the Chinese economy placed a stress on its ecological environment and natural resources. Several indices of Chinese rivers from the emergy evaluation were close to those of average global river water. The main average indices of Chinese rivers were transformity (4.17 × 104 sej/J), emergy per volume (2.05 × 1011 sej/m3), and emdollar per volume (0.06 $/m3). The total value of all the rivers’ water made up 13.0% of the GDP of China in 2002, and that of water consumption accounted for 2.1%. The value of the water resources in the Haihe-luanhe River (11.39 × 104 sej/J) was the highest, followed by the Yellow River (10.27 × 104 sej/J), while the rivers in Southwest China had the lowest values (2.92 × 104 sej/J).
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 297
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Abu-Zeid MA(1998)Water and sustainable development: the vision for world water, life and the environment Water Policy 1 9-19
  • [2] Blamey R(1999)Choice modelling: assessing the environment values of water supply options The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 3 337-357
  • [3] Gordon J(2002)The transferability of benefit transfer: contingent valuation of water quality improvements in Costa Rica Ecological Economics 42 147-164
  • [4] Chapman R(1996)Emergy analysis perspectives of Thailand and Mekong River dam proposals Ecological Modelling 91 105-130
  • [5] Barton DN(1999)Emergy evaluation of natural capital and biosphere services AMBIO 6 468-493
  • [6] Brown MT(2005)Application of contingent valuation method in research on agricultural water price of irrigation district Water Saving Irrigation 5 2-4
  • [7] McClanahan TR(1997)The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital Nature 387 253-260
  • [8] Brown MT(2002)Emergy evaluation perspectives of a multipurpose dam proposal in Korea Journal of Environmental Management 66 293-306
  • [9] Ulgiati S(1999)Estimating irrigation water value using hedonic price analysis Land economics 3 440-452
  • [10] Chen D(1998)The research of value-model assessment about value of water resource Journal of natural resources 1 35-43