Rates of Chlorimuron Applied in Glyphosate-Tolerant and Sulfonylurea-Tolerant Soybean

被引：3

作者：

Albrecht L.P. ^{[1
]}

Albrecht A.J.P. ^{[1
]}

Silva A.F.M. ^{[2
]}

Krenchinski F.H. ^{[3
]}

Placido H.F. ^{[2
]}

Filho R.V. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Agronomic Sciences, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Palotina Campus, Palotina, PR

[2] Department of Crop Science, University of São Paulo (USP), “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture (ESALQ), Piracicaba, SP

[3] Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP

来源：

Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology | 2018年 / 21卷 / 3期

关键词：

agronomic performance; ALS inhibitors; Glycine max (L.) Merr; Herbicide-tolerant crops; selectivity;

D O I：

10.1007/s12892-018-0029-0

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Susceptibility to chlorimuron varies according to soybean genotype. STS® (sulfonylurea-tolerant soybean) presents a high tolerance to some sulfonylureas; this feature is determined by semi-dominants alleles, Als1 and Als2. Experiments were conducted in the field for four seasons with two cultivars for season to evaluate the selectivity of chlorimuron rates in post-emergency (V4) of glyphosate-tolerant and sulfonylurea-tolerant soybean. Data analysis made it possible to infer that there was no significant effect on the productivity of the cultivars when they received application in post-emergency, of chlorimuron at the doses used (0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 g ai ha-1). The maximum recommended rate for non-STS cultivars of chlorimuron is 20 g ai ha-1, or 4.5 times less than the maximum rate employed in this study. The soybean cultivars CD 250 RR/STS, CD 236 RR/STS, CD 2630 RR/STS, and BMX Turbo RR/STS were tolerant to the application, in post-emergency (V4) of the herbicide chlorimuron, until the rate of 90 g ai ha-1. © 2018, Korean Society of Crop Science and Springer Nature B.V.

引用

页码：211 / 216

页数：5

共 29 条

[21]

Reddy K.N., Whiting K., Weed control and economic comparisons of glyphosate-resistant, sulfonylurea-tolerant, and conventional soybean (Glycine max) systems, Weed Technol., 14, pp. 204-211, (2000)

[22]

Rodrigues B.N., Almeida F.S., Guia de herbicidas, (2011)

[23]

Rogozin I.B., Berikov V.B., Vasunina E.A., Sinitsina O.I., The effect of the primary structure of DNA on induction of mutations by alkylating agents, Russ. J. Genet., 37, pp. 704-710, (2001)

[24]

Roso A.C., Vidal R.A., Culturas resistentes aos herbicidas inibidores da enzima ALS: revisão de literatura, Pestic: Rev. Ecotox. M. Amb., 21, pp. 13-24, (2011)

[25]

Sebastian S.A., Fader G.M., Ulrich J.F., Forney D.R., Chaleff R.S., Semidominant soybean mutation for resistance to sulfonylurea herbicides, Crop Sci., 29, pp. 1403-1408, (1989)

[26]

Shaw D.R., Arnold J.C., Snipes C.E., Laughlin D.H., Mills J.A., Comparison of glyphosate-resistant and nontransgenic soybean (Glycine max) herbicide systems, Weed Technol., 15, pp. 676-685, (2001)

[27]

Silva A.F.M., Albrecht A.J.P., Albrecht L.V., Filho R., Giovanelli B.F., Application of post-emergence ALS inhibitor herbicides associated or not to glyphosate in RR/STS soybean, Planta Daninha, 34, pp. 765-775, (2016)

[28]

Velini D.E., Osipe R., Gazziero D.L.P., Procedimentos para instalação, avaliação e análise de experimentos com herbicidas, (1995)

[29]

Walter K.L., Strachan S.D., Ferry N.M., Albert H.H., Castle L.A., Sebastian S.A., Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1 and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean, Pest Manag. Sci., 70, pp. 1831-1839, (2014)

← 1 2 3 →