Exploratory analysis of modularization strategy based on the theory of constraints thinking process

被引:0
作者
Eidelwein F. [1 ]
Piran F.A.S. [1 ]
Lacerda D.P. [1 ]
Dresch A. [1 ]
Rodrigues L.H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos – UNISINOS, Av. Unisinos, 950 – Bairro Cristo Rei, São Leopoldo, CEP 93.022-000, RS
[2] Instituto de Estudos Sistêmicos do Brasil, Porto Alegre
关键词
Modularization; Modularization strategy; Operational performance; Product variety; Theory of constraints;
D O I
10.1007/s40171-017-0177-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The search for competitiveness has led companies to increase the variety of products on offer in their portfolios with the aim of broadening their consumer market. However, there is a trade-off between increasing product variety and operational performance. Thus, the aim of this paper is to analyze the critical root causes that can prevent manufacturing companies from obtaining sustainable growth, by showing how modularization strategy can contribute in this area. In order to achieve the proposed objective, a bibliographical review was carried out for the topic, and an effect–cause–effect analysis was subsequently structured using the theory of constraints thinking process. From the main results, it was possible to identify that, besides the use of modularization strategy, supplier participation in the product development process needs to be considered, as well as defining constraints in the flow of production and postponing the definition of final products. Another contribution from the article is it presents an integrated effect–cause–effect analysis that lays out the contributions from modularization strategy. Adopting the strategy can contribute toward manufacturing companies obtaining sustainable growth. © Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management 2017.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 122
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Antonio K.W.L., Richard C.M.Y., Tang E., The complementarity of internal integration and product modularity: An empirical study of their interaction effect on competitive capabilities, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 26, pp. 305-326, (2009)
[2]  
Antonio K.W.L., Yam R.C.M., Tang E., The impacts of product modularity on competitive capabilities and performance: An empirical study, International Journal of Production Economics, 105, pp. 1-20, (2007)
[3]  
Asadi N., Fundin A., Jackson M., The essential constituents of flexible assembly systems: A case study in the heavy vehicle manufacturing industry, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16, pp. 235-250, (2015)
[4]  
Balakrishnan J., Cheng C.H., The theory of constraints and the make-or-buy decision: An update and review, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 41, pp. 40-47, (2005)
[5]  
Baldwin C.Y., Clark K.B., Managing in an age of modularity, Harvard Business Review, 75, 5, pp. 84-93, (1997)
[6]  
Baldwin C.Y., Clark K.B., Design Rules (The Power of Modularity, V. 1), (2000)
[7]  
Barbosa L.M., Lacerda D.P., Piran F.A.S., Dresch A., Exploratory analysis of the variables prevailing on the effects of product modularization on production volume and efficiency, International Journal of Production Economics, (2017)
[8]  
Budd C.S., Traditional measures in finance and accounting, problems, literature review, and TOC measures, Theory of Constraints Handbook, pp. 335-371, (2013)
[9]  
Cabigiosu A., Zirpoli F., Camuffo A., Modularity, interfaces definition and the integration of external sources of innovation in the automotive industry, Research Policy, 42, pp. 662-675, (2013)
[10]  
Chakravarty A.K., Balakrishnan N., Achieving product variety through optimal choice of module variations, IIE Transactions (Institute of Industrial Engineering), 33, pp. 587-598, (2007)