Employee Stock Ownership Plans and Corporate Environmental Engagement

被引:0
|
作者
Dongmin Kong
Jia Liu
Yanan Wang
Ling Zhu
机构
[1] Huazhong University of Science and Technology,School of Economics
[2] University of Portsmouth,School of Accounting, Economics and Finance
[3] Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,School of Finance
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2024年 / 189卷
关键词
Employee incentives; Employee stock ownership plans; Corporate environmental engagement; Stakeholder theory; Agency theory; Climate change ethics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study examines the impact of non-executive employee stock ownership plans (ESOP) on corporate environmental engagement. We show that granting ESOPs to non-executive employees promotes greater corporate ecological engagement from the perspectives of environmental protection expenditures, environmental information disclosure quality, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings. ESOPs unite members in a common interest, empowering them to put pressure on management to reduce carbon emissions, which benefits their physical wellbeing and increases their residual interest in long-term corporate wealth. Further, our analysis reveals that companies investing in environmental protection forgo short-term profit as a consequence of high initial costs, while increasing long-term firm value. These positive effects are attributable to ESOP schemes with higher employee subscription rates, those granted to a larger number of non-executive employees, and those with longer validity periods of ownership, whose incentive effect is sufficiently powerful to offset the free-rider problem. In addition, the impact of ESOPs is more pronounced in companies with greater media exposure, those confronting intense labor market competition, and those in heavily polluting industries. Fundamentally, our study provides novel evidence of the incentive effect of ESOPs on corporate environmental engagement and of stakeholder dynamics driving the implementation of carbon reduction strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 199
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Employee stock options as warrants
    Eberhart, AC
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2005, 29 (10) : 2409 - 2433
  • [22] Corporate social responsibility, ownership structure, and corporate governance-An analysis of the Brazilian firm
    Forte, Hyane Correia
    Crisostomo, Vicente Lima
    Lopez-Iturriaga, Felix Javier
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 32 (01) : 866 - 880
  • [23] The Influence of Ownership Concentration on Firm Resource Allocations to Employee Relations, External Social Actions, and Environmental Action
    Crisostomo, Vicente Lima
    Freire, Fatima de Souza
    RBGN-REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GESTAO DE NEGOCIOS, 2015, 17 (55): : 987 - 1006
  • [24] An investigation of the association between ownership structure and corporate performance Empirical evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE)
    Alipour, Mohammad
    MANAGEMENT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2013, 36 (11): : 1137 - 1166
  • [25] Corporate cash holdings and promoter ownership
    Gupta, C. P.
    Bedi, Prateek
    EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2020, 44
  • [26] The structure of ownership and corporate acquisition strategies
    Wright, P
    Kroll, M
    Lado, A
    van Ness, B
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2002, 23 (01) : 41 - 53
  • [27] Corporate governance, family ownership and performance
    Giovannini R.
    Journal of Management & Governance, 2010, 14 (2) : 145 - 166
  • [28] Employee satisfaction and the cost of corporate borrowing
    Chi, Wentao
    Chen, Yun
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 40
  • [29] Impact of institutional ownership on environmental disclosure in Indonesian companies
    Wicaksono, Aditya Pandu
    Kusuma, Hadri
    Cahaya, Fitra Roman
    Rosjidi, Anis Al
    Rahman, Arief
    Rahayu, Isti
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2024, 24 (01): : 139 - 154
  • [30] STAKEHOLDERS AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: AN OWNERSHIP PERSPECTIVE
    Foss, Nicolai J.
    Klein, Peter G.
    SUSTAINABILITY, STAKEHOLDER GOVERNANCE, AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, 2018, 38 : 17 - 35