Current status and trends in performance-based risk-sharing arrangements between healthcare payers and medical product manufacturers

被引:52
作者
Carlson J.J. [1 ]
Gries K.S. [1 ]
Yeung K. [1 ]
Sullivan S.D. [1 ]
Garrison Jr. L.P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7630
关键词
National Health Service; Health Technology Assessment; Administrative Burden; Conditional Coverage; Pharmaceutical Benefit Advisory Committee;
D O I
10.1007/s40258-014-0093-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Our objective was to identify and characterize publicly available cases and related trends for performance-based risk-sharing arrangements (PBRSAs). We performed a review of PBRSAs over the past 20 years (1993-2013) using available databases and reports from colleagues and healthcare experts. These were categorized according to a previously published taxonomy of scheme types and assessed in terms of the underlying product and market attributes for each scheme. Macro-level trends were identified related to the timing of scheme adoption, countries involved, types of arrangements, and product and market factors. Our search yielded 148 arrangements. From this set, 65 arrangements included a coverage with an evidence development component, 20 included a conditional treatment continuation component, 54 included a performance-linked reimbursement component, and 42 included a financial utilization component. Each type of scheme addresses fundamental uncertainties that exist when products enter the market. The pace of adoption appears to be slowing, but new countries continue to implement PBRSAs. Over this 20-year period, there has been a consistent movement toward arrangements that minimize administrative burden. In conclusion, the pace of PBRSA adoption appears to be slowing but still has traction in many health systems. These remain a viable coverage and reimbursement mechanism for a wide range of medical products. The long-term viability and growth of these arrangements will rest in the ability of the parties to develop mutually beneficial arrangements that entail minimal administrative burden in their development and implementation. © 2014 Springer International Publishing.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 238
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Carlson J.J., Sullivan S.D., Garrison L.P., Neumann P.J., Veenstra D.L., Linking payment to health outcomes: A taxonomy and examination of performance-based reimbursement schemes between healthcare payers and manufacturers, Health Policy, 96, 3, pp. 179-190, (2010)
  • [2] De Pouvourville G., Risk-sharing agreements for innovative drugs: A new solution to old problems?, Eur J Health Econ, 7, 3, pp. 155-157, (2006)
  • [3] Espin J., Rovira J., Olry De Labry A., WHO/HAI Project on Medicine Prices and Availability, Review Series on Pharmaceutical Pricing Policies and Interventions. Working Paper 1: External Reference Pricing, (2011)
  • [4] Walker S., Sculpher M., Claxton K., Palmer S., Coverage with evidence development, only in research, risk sharing, or patient access scheme? A framework for coverage decisions, Value Health, 15, 3, pp. 570-579, (2012)
  • [5] Louis P., Garrison J., Towse A., Briggs A., Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements-good practices for design, implementation, and evaluation: ISPOR good practices for performance-based risk-sharing arrangements task force report, Value Health, 16, 5, pp. 703-719, (2013)
  • [6] Citizens Council Report on "only in Research"-questionnaire, (2007)
  • [7] The Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme, (2009)
  • [8] A New Value-based Approach to the Pricing of Branded Medicines, (2010)
  • [9] List of Technologies with Approved Patient Access Schemes, Recommended by NICE for Use in the NHS, (2013)
  • [10] ISPOR Global Health Care Systems Road Map, (2013)