The development of an instrument to measure school readiness for a prevention program

被引:0
作者
Dymnicki A.B. [1 ]
Henry D.B. [2 ]
Myford C.M. [2 ]
机构
[1] American Institutes for Research, 1000 Thomas Jefferson NW, Washington, 20003, DC
[2] University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
关键词
Assessment; Environmental measurement; Multilevel analyses; School climate; School environment;
D O I
10.1007/s10984-015-9183-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There is a need to understand how environmental characteristics of a school influence the effectiveness of prevention efforts. Although researchers have discussed the importance of conducting needs assessments before implementing interventions, few of these types of assessments focus on the relational aspect. Furthermore, few assessments have the appropriate psychometric evidence to support that they are reliably assessing an environmental concept (e.g., a construct at the school level versus at the individual level). To fill this void, we developed a scale assessing the level of school problems and the quality of relationships among principals, teachers and students. Test data were collected from 368 teachers in 37 schools who participated in a randomised controlled trial of a violence prevention program. The many-faceted Rasch rating scale model was used to analyse the data. Information on construct dimensionality, school-level reliability, internal consistency, concurrent validity and predictive validity indicated satisfactory psychometric properties for this measure. We discuss contributions of this study to the measurement of school settings and the potential benefit of implementing more effective school-based interventions by collecting this type of baseline information. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 287
页数:20
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Anderson C.S., The search for school climate: A review of the research, Review of Educational Research, 52, pp. 368-420, (1982)
  • [2] Anderson A., Thomas D.R., Moore D.W., Kool B., Improvements in school climate associated with enhanced health and welfare services for students, Learning Environments Research, 11, 3, pp. 245-256, (2008)
  • [3] Atara S., Chan D.W.K., Teacher interpersonal behavior and secondary students’ cognitive, affective and moral outcomes in Hong Kong, Learning Environments Research, 16, pp. 23-36, (2013)
  • [4] Brown T.A., Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, (2006)
  • [5] The difficulty of maintaining positive intervention effects: A look at disruptive behavior, deviant peer relations, and social skills during the middle school years, Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, pp. 593-624, (2009)
  • [6] DeVoe J.F., Peter K., Noonan M., Snyder T.D., Baum K., Indicators of school crime and safety: 2005 (NCES 2006–001/NCJ 210697). U. S, Departments of Education and Justice, (2005)
  • [7] Downer J.T., Rimm-Kaufman S.E., Pianta R.C., How do classroom conditions and children’s risk for school problems contribute to children’s engagement in learning?, School Psychology Review, 36, pp. 413-432, (2007)
  • [8] Dymnicki A.B., Moderating effects of school climate on outcomes for the Multi-Site Violence Prevention Project universal program, Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24, pp. 383-398, (2013)
  • [9] Floyd F.J., Widaman K.F., Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments, Psychological Assessment, 7, pp. 286-299, (1995)
  • [10] Fox R.S., Boies H.E., Brainard E., Fletcher E., Huge J.S., Martin C.L., Et al., School climate improvement: A challenge to the school administrator, (1973)