Biofilm of Klebsiella pneumoniae minimize phagocytosis and cytokine expression by macrophage cell line

被引:0
作者
Sudarshan Singh Rathore
Lalitha Cheepurupalli
Jaya Gangwar
Thiagarajan Raman
Jayapradha Ramakrishnan
机构
[1] SASTRA Deemed University,Centre for Research in Infectious Diseases (CRID), School of Chemical and Biotechnology (SCBT)
[2] Tamil Nadu,Department of Advanced Zoology and Biotechnology
[3] Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda College,undefined
来源
AMB Express | / 12卷
关键词
Biofilm; Phagocytosis; Macrophage; Immune response; Cytokine;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Infectious bacteria in biofilm mode are involved in many persistent infections. Owing to its importance in clinical settings, many in vitro and in vivo studies are being conducted to study the structural and functional properties of biofilms, their drug resistant mechanism and the s urvival mechanism of planktonic and biofilm cells. In this regard, there is not sufficient information on the interaction between Klebsiella biofilm and macrophages. In this study, we have attempted to unravel the interaction between Klebsiella biofilm and macrophages in terms of phagocytic response and cytokine expression. In vitro phagocytosis assays were performed for heat inactivated and live biofilms of K. pneumoniae, together with the expression analysis of TLR2, iNOS, inflammatory cytokines such as IL-β1, IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-12, IL-4, TNF-α and anti-inflammatory cytokine, IL-10. A phagocytic rate of an average of 15% was observed against both heat inactivated and live biofilms when LPS + IFN-γ activated macrophages were used. This was significantly higher than non-activated macrophages when tested against heat inactivated and live biofilms (average 8%). Heat-inactivated and live biofilms induced similar phagocytic responses and up-regulation of pro-inflammatory genes in macrophages, indirectly conveying that macrophage responses are to some extent dependent on the biofilm matrix.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 192 条
[1]  
Anderl JN(2000)Role of antibiotic penetration limitation in Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44 1818-1824
[2]  
Franklin MJ(2012) biofilm resistance to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin Future Microbiol 7 227-239
[3]  
Stewart PS(2014)Future perspective on host–pathogen interactions during bacterial biofilm formation within the nasopharynx mBio 5 e01116-e1214
[4]  
Blanchette KA(2016)Biofilms formed by gram-negative bacteria undergo increased lipid a palmitoylation, enhancing in vivo survival FEMS Microbiol Lett 363 fnw219-15
[5]  
Orihuela CJ(2020)The emerging problems of Int J Antimicrob Agents 56 555-211
[6]  
Chalabaev S(2022) infections: carbapenem resistance and biofilm formation Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12 1-1538
[7]  
Chauhan A(2016)Immunomodulatory effects of colistin on host responses against carbapenem-resistant BMC Genomics 17 205-140
[8]  
Novikov A(2016) biofilms In Vivo 30 1529-1073
[9]  
Iyer P(2017)Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilms and their role in disease pathogenesis J Microbiol Biotechnol 27 123-5407
[10]  
Szczesny M(2004)Transcriptional profiling of Nat Rev Microbiol. 2 346-178