The politics of incremental change: institutional change in old-age pensions and health care in Germany; [Die Politik der schrittweisen Veränderung: Institutioneller Wandel bei Altersrenten und Gesundheitsversorgung in Deutschland]

被引:0
作者
Anderson K.M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology, University of Southampton, Southampton
来源
Journal for Labour Market Research | 2015年 / 48卷 / 2期
关键词
Germany; Health care; Institutionalism; Pensions; Welfare state;
D O I
10.1007/s12651-015-0180-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper analyzes policy shifts in two core welfare state programs in Germany: old-age pensions and health care. Both programs are prototypes of Bismarckian/conservative program design (benefits are based on occupational and family status; financing is based on payroll contributions, and administration is based on corporatist arrangements) and both have experienced tremendous cost pressures because of demographic change and rising non-wage labor costs. A series of reforms since the late 1980s has reduced the generosity of benefits and aims to change the governance structures of both programs. Although the reforms include substantial benefit cuts, key conservative principles concerning benefit entitlement and financing remain largely untouched. In both programs, derived rights based on family status remain strong, and occupational fragmentation continues to characterize the overall structure of both systems. The paper argues that this pattern of institutional change is not new, but is typical of the politics of muddling through that has characterized the German system since its inception. I emphasize the impact of German political institutions, the structure of electoral competition, and the legacies of conservative social policy to explain the contemporary pattern of policy development. © 2015, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 131
页数:18
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Alber J., Vom Armenhaus zum Wohlfahrtsstaat: Analysen zur Entwicklung der Sozialversicherung in Westeuropa, (1982)
[2]  
Alber J., Der Sozialstaat in der Bundesrepublik 1950–1983, (1989)
[3]  
Alber J., Das Gesundheitswesen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Entwicklung, Struktur und Funktionsweise, (1992)
[4]  
Anderson K.M., Meyer T., Social democracy, unions, and pension politics in Germany and Sweden, J. Public. Policy, 23, pp. 23-54, (2003)
[5]  
Anderson K.M., Meyer T., New social risks and pension reform in Germany and Sweden. The politics of pension rights for childcare, The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States, (2006)
[6]  
Germany, Annual National Report, 2012, (2012)
[7]  
Bandelow N.C., Health governance in the aftermath of traditional corporatism: One small step for the legislator, one giant leap for the subsystem?, Ger. Policy. Stud., 5, 1, pp. 45-63, (2009)
[8]  
Bridgen P., Meyer T., The liberalisation of the German social model: Public-private pension reform in Germany since 2001, J. Soc. Policy, 43, 1, pp. 37-68, (2014)
[9]  
Ergänzender Bericht der Bundesregierung zum Rentenversicherungsbericht 2012 gemäß § 154 Abs, 2 SGB, VI, Altersversicherungsbericht 2012, (2013)
[10]  
Carrera P., Siemens K., Bridges J., Health care financing reforms in Germany: The case for rethinking the evolutionary approach to reforms, J. Health. Polit. Policy. Law, 33, 5, pp. 979-1005, (2008)