Extensive fusion for Lenke 3C and 6C scoliosis: a two year radiographic follow-up

[1] Newton PO(2003)Factors involved in the decision to perform a selective versus nonselective fusion of Lenke 1B and 1C (King-Moe II) curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Spine 28 S217-S223

[2] Faro FD(2009)The deformity-flexibility quotient predicts both patient satisfaction and surgeon preference in the treatment of Lenke 1B or 1C curves for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Spine 34 1032-1039

[3] Lenke LG(2011)Determination of lowest instrumented vertebra by the location of apical vertebra in Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Int Orthop 35 561-567

[4] Newton PO(2009)Retrospective analysis of anterior correction and fusion for adolescent idiopathic thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis: the relationship between preserving mobile segments and trunk balance Int Orthop 33 191-196

[5] Upasani VV(2001)Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis J Bone Joint Surg Am 83A 1169-1181

[6] Bastrom TP(2000)Longitudinal changes in trunkal balance after selective fusion of King II curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Spine 25 1352-1359

[7] Tao F(1991)Surgical treatment of double major scoliosis. Improvement of the lumbar curve after fusion of the thoracic curve J Bone Joint Surg Br 73 121-124

[8] Shi Z(1999)Spontaneous lumbar curve coronal correction after selective anterior or posterior thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Spine 24 1663-1671

[9] Xie Y(1992)Lumbar curve response in type II idiopathic scoliosis after posterior instrumentation of the thoracic spine Spine 17 S282-S286

[10] Liu Y(1998)Coronal and sagittal balance in surgically treated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with the King II curve pattern Spine 23 2063-2073

[1] Newton PO(2003)Factors involved in the decision to perform a selective versus nonselective fusion of Lenke 1B and 1C (King-Moe II) curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Spine 28 S217-S223

[2] Faro FD(2009)The deformity-flexibility quotient predicts both patient satisfaction and surgeon preference in the treatment of Lenke 1B or 1C curves for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Spine 34 1032-1039

[3] Lenke LG(2011)Determination of lowest instrumented vertebra by the location of apical vertebra in Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Int Orthop 35 561-567

[4] Newton PO(2009)Retrospective analysis of anterior correction and fusion for adolescent idiopathic thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis: the relationship between preserving mobile segments and trunk balance Int Orthop 33 191-196

[5] Upasani VV(2001)Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis J Bone Joint Surg Am 83A 1169-1181

[6] Bastrom TP(2000)Longitudinal changes in trunkal balance after selective fusion of King II curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Spine 25 1352-1359

[7] Tao F(1991)Surgical treatment of double major scoliosis. Improvement of the lumbar curve after fusion of the thoracic curve J Bone Joint Surg Br 73 121-124

[8] Shi Z(1999)Spontaneous lumbar curve coronal correction after selective anterior or posterior thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Spine 24 1663-1671

[9] Xie Y(1992)Lumbar curve response in type II idiopathic scoliosis after posterior instrumentation of the thoracic spine Spine 17 S282-S286

[10] Liu Y(1998)Coronal and sagittal balance in surgically treated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with the King II curve pattern Spine 23 2063-2073