Bugs as features (part 2): a perspective on enriching microbiome–gut–brain axis analyses

被引:4
作者
Thomaz F. S. Bastiaanssen
Thomas P. Quinn
Amy Loughman
机构
[1] APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork
[2] Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University College Cork, Cork
[3] Independent Scientist, Geelong, VIC
[4] IMPACT (the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation), Food and Mood Centre, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC
来源
Nature Mental Health | 2023年 / 1卷 / 12期
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1038/s44220-023-00149-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The microbiome–gut–brain axis field is multidisciplinary, benefiting from the expertise of microbiology, ecology, psychiatry, computational biology, and epidemiology among other disciplines. As the field matures and moves beyond a basic demonstration of its relevance, it is critical that study design and analyses are robust and foster reproducibility. In this companion piece to Bugs as features (part 1), we present techniques from adjacent and disparate fields to enrich and inform the analysis of microbiome–gut–brain axis data. Emerging techniques built specifically for the microbiome–gut–brain axis are also demonstrated. All of these methods are contextualized to inform several common challenges: how do we establish causality; how can we integrate data from multiple ’omics techniques; how might we account for the dynamicism of host–microbiome interactions? This perspective is offered to experienced and emerging microbiome scientists alike to assist with these questions and others at the study conception, design, analysis, and interpretation stages of research. © Springer Nature America, Inc. 2023.
引用
收藏
页码:939 / 949
页数:10
相关论文
共 106 条
  • [1] Bastiaanssen T.F.S., Quinn T.P., Loughman A., Bugs as features (Part 1): Concepts and foundations for the compositional data analysis of the microbiome–gut–brain axis, Nat. Ment. Health, (2023)
  • [2] Walter J., Armet A.M., Finlay B.B., Shanahan F., Establishing or exaggerating causality for the gut microbiome: lessons from human microbiota-associated rodents, Cell, 180, pp. 221-232, (2020)
  • [3] Bastiaanssen T.F.S., Cryan J.F., The microbiota–gut–brain axis in mental health and medication response: parsing directionality and causality, Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol, 24, pp. 216-220, (2021)
  • [4] Sugihara G., Et al., Detecting causality in complex ecosystems, Science, 338, pp. 496-500, (2012)
  • [5] Koch R., Untersuchungen uber bakterien v. die aetiologie der milzbrand-krankheit, begrunder auf die entwicklungegeschichte bacillus anthracis, Beitrage zur biologie der Pflanzen, 2, pp. 277-310, (1877)
  • [6] Hill A.B., The environment and disease: association or causation, Proc. R. Soc. Med, 58, pp. 295-300, (1965)
  • [7] Hernan M.A., The c-word: scientific euphemisms do not improve causal inference from observational data, Am. J. Public Health, 108, pp. 616-619, (2018)
  • [8] VanderWeele T.J., Robins J.M., Directed acyclic graphs, sufficient causes, and the properties of conditioning on a common effect, Am. J. Epidemiol, 166, pp. 1096-1104, (2007)
  • [9] Zhu F., Et al., Metagenome-wide association of gut microbiome features for schizophrenia, Nat. Commun, 11, (2020)
  • [10] MacKinnon D.P., Fairchild A.J., Fritz M.S., Mediation analysis, Annu. Rev. Psychol, 58, pp. 593-614, (2007)