Autograft versus allograft reconstruction of acute tibial plateau fractures: a comparative study of complications and outcome

被引：6
作者：
Bagherifard A. [1 ]
Ghandhari H. [1 ]
Jabalameli M. [1 ]
Rahbar M. [1 ]
Hadi H. [1 ]
Moayedfar M. [1 ]
Sajadi M.M. [1 ]
Karimpour A. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Mojahedin Islam Avenue, Shohada Sq, Tehran
来源：
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | 2017年 / 27卷 / 5期
关键词：
Allograft; Autograft; Reconstruction; Tibial plateau fractures;
D O I：
10.1007/s00590-016-1863-y
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Background: There is no consensus regarding the use of filling agent in the re-elevation of depressed tibial plateau fracture (TPF). Although autograft is considered as the gold standard approach of such reconstructions, its limitation has led to a recent attraction toward allograft substitution. In this study, we compare the complications and outcome of autograft and allograft in TPF reconstruction, in order to address the existing controversy. Materials and methods: A total of 81 patients with acute TPF were included in this study. Allograft and autograft were applied in 58 and 23 cases, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 40.26 years, and the mean follow-up period of patients was 19.1 months. Clinical and radiological assessment of the outcome was conducted, employing the modified Rasmussen clinical criteria. Results: A total of three infections were observed in our patients, from which two infections occurred in allograft received patients. Articular surface collapse was seen in two cases, including one allograft and one autograft receiving patient. The mean clinical score was 18.65 and 18.55 in autograft and allograft received patients, respectively (p = 0.09). The mean radiological score was 15.65 and 15.68 in autograft and allograft received patients (p = 0.3). Conclusion: With respect to the comparable complication rate, clinical and radiological outcome of allogenic versus autologous reconstruction of TPF, freeze-dried allograft could be recommended as an appropriate substitute of autograft in this treatment. Nevertheless, the longer follow-up period of the patients could further extend our understanding of the clinical outcome of each component. © 2016, Springer-Verlag France.
引用
收藏
页码：665 / 671
页数：6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Tscherne H., Lobenhoffer P., Tibial plateau fractures: management and expected results, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 292, pp. 87-100, (1993)
  • [2] Henry P., Wasserstein D., Paterson M., Kreder H., Jenkinson R., Risk factors for reoperation and mortality after the operative treatment of tibial plateau fractures in Ontario, J Orthop Trauma, 29, 4, pp. 182-188, (2015)
  • [3] Basques B.A., Webb M.L., Bohl D.D., Golinvaux N.S., Grauer J.N., Adverse events, length of stay, and readmission after surgery for tibial plateau fractures, J Orthop Trauma, 29, 3, pp. e121-e126, (2015)
  • [4] Goff T., Kanakaris N.K., Giannoudis P.V., Use of bone graft substitutes in the management of tibial plateau fractures, Injury, 44, pp. S86-S94, (2013)
  • [5] Veitch S.W., Stroud R.M., Toms A.D., Compaction bone grafting in tibial plateau fracture fixation, J Trauma, 68, 4, pp. 980-983, (2010)
  • [6] Feng W., Fu L., Liu J., Li D., Qi X., The use of deep frozen and irradiated bone allografts in the reconstruction of tibial plateau fractures, Cell Tissue Bank, 14, 3, pp. 375-380, (2013)
  • [7] Keating J., McQueen M., Substitutes for autologous bone graft in orthopaedic trauma, J Bone Jt Surg Br, 83, 1, pp. 3-8, (2001)
  • [8] Lasanianos N., Mouzopoulos G., Garnavos C., The use of freeze-dried cancelous allograft in the management of impacted tibial plateau fractures, Injury, 39, 10, pp. 1106-1112, (2008)
  • [9] Ong J., Kennedy M., Mitra A., Harty J., Fixation of tibial plateau fractures with synthetic bone graft versus natural bone graft: a comparison study, Ir J Med Sci, 181, 2, pp. 247-252, (2012)
  • [10] Chiarello E., Cadossi M., Tedesco G., Capra P., Calamelli C., Shehu A., Et al., Autograft, allograft and bone substitutes in reconstructive orthopedic surgery, Aging Clin Exp Res, 25, 1, pp. 101-103, (2013)
123