Technology enhanced assessment in complex collaborative settings

被引:24
作者
Webb M. [1 ]
Gibson D. [2 ]
机构
[1] King’s College London, London
[2] Curtin University, Bentley
关键词
Assessment; Assessment as learning; Assessment for learning; Assessment of learning; Collaborative learning; Quiet assessment;
D O I
10.1007/s10639-015-9413-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Building upon discussions by the Assessment Working Group at EDUsummIT 2013, this article reviews recent developments in technology enabled assessments of collaborative problem solving in order to point out where computerised assessments are particularly useful (and where non-computerised assessments need to be retained or developed) while assuring that the purposes and designs are transparent and empowering for teachers and learners. Technology enabled assessments of higher order critical thinking in a collaborative social context can provide data about the actions, communications and products created by a learner in a designed task space. Principled assessment design is required in order for such a space to provide trustworthy evidence of learning, and the design must incorporate and take account of the engagement of the audiences for the assessment as well as vary with the purposes and contexts of the assessment. Technology enhanced assessment enables in-depth unobtrusive documentation or ‘quiet assessment’ of the many layers and dynamics of authentic performance and allows greater flexibility and dynamic interactions in and among the design features. Most important for assessment FOR learning, are interactive features that allow the learner to turn up or down the intensity, amount and sharpness of the information needed for self-absorption and adoption of the feedback. Most important in assessment OF learning, are features that compare the learner with external standards of performance. Most important in assessment AS learning, are features that allow multiple performances and a wide array of affordances for authentic action, communication and the production of artefacts. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 695
页数:20
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Anderson D., Nashon S., Thomas G., Evolution of research methods for probing and understanding metacognition, Research in Science Education, 39, 2, pp. 181-195, (2009)
[2]  
Baker R.S.J., Data mining for education, International Encyclopedia of Education, 3, pp. 112-118, (2010)
[3]  
Barron B., When smart groups fail, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 3, pp. 307-359, (2003)
[4]  
Bell T., Urhahne D., Schanze S., Ploetzner R., Collaborative inquiry learning: models, tools, and challenges, International Journal of Science Education, 32, 3, pp. 349-377, (2009)
[5]  
Black P., Wiliam D., Inside the Black Box, (1998)
[6]  
Black P., Harrison C., Lee C., Marshall B., Wiliam D., Working inside the black box: assessment for learning in the classroom, (2002)
[7]  
Black P., Harrison C., Lee C., Marshall B., Wiliam D., Assessment for learning: putting it into practice, (2003)
[8]  
Black P., Harrison C., Hodgen J., Marshall B., Serret N., Validity in teachers’ summative assessments, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17, 2, pp. 215-232, (2010)
[9]  
Blatchford P., Baines E., Rubie-Davies C., Bassett P., Chowne A., The effect of a new approach to group work on pupil-pupil and teacher-pupil interactions, Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 4, pp. 750-765, (2006)
[10]  
Bloom B.S., Englehart M.B., Furst E.J., Hill W.H., Krathwohl D.R., Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals - handbook I: cognitive domain, (1956)