Anterior approach sacrospinous hysteropexy: native tissue compared with mesh-augmented repair for primary uterovaginal prolapse management

[1] Hefni M(2003)Sacrospinous cervicocolpopexy with uterine conservation for uterovaginal prolapse in elderly women: an evolving concept Am J Obstet Gynecol 188 645-650

[2] El-Toukhy T(2003)Sacrospinous hysteropexy compared to vaginal hysterectomy as primary surgical treatment for a descensus uteri: effects on urinary symptoms Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14 350-355

[3] Bhaumik J(2010)One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study Int Urogynecol J 21 209-216

[4] Katsimanis E(2017)Evaluation of sacrospinous hysteropexy vs. uterosacral suspension for the treatment of uterine prolapse: a retrospective assessment Low Urin Tract Symptoms 9 33-37

[5] van Brummen HJ(2019)Surgical treatment of primary uterine prolapse: a comparison of vaginal native tissue surgical techniques Int Urogynecol J 30 1887-1893

[6] van de Pol G(2013)Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013 CD004014-1065

[7] Aalders CI(2018)Hysteropexy: an option for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse Curr Urol Rep 19 15-11

[8] Heintz AP(2019)Effect of vaginal mesh hysteropexy vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: a randomized clinical trial JAMA 322 1054-696

[9] van der Vaart CH(2017)Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study Am J Obstet Gynecol 216 38.e1-637

[10] Dietz V(2021)Database updates and resulting changes in data in study of vaginal mesh hysteropexy vs vaginal hysterectomy JAMA 325 695-1563

[1] Hefni M(2003)Sacrospinous cervicocolpopexy with uterine conservation for uterovaginal prolapse in elderly women: an evolving concept Am J Obstet Gynecol 188 645-650

[2] El-Toukhy T(2003)Sacrospinous hysteropexy compared to vaginal hysterectomy as primary surgical treatment for a descensus uteri: effects on urinary symptoms Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14 350-355

[3] Bhaumik J(2010)One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study Int Urogynecol J 21 209-216

[4] Katsimanis E(2017)Evaluation of sacrospinous hysteropexy vs. uterosacral suspension for the treatment of uterine prolapse: a retrospective assessment Low Urin Tract Symptoms 9 33-37

[5] van Brummen HJ(2019)Surgical treatment of primary uterine prolapse: a comparison of vaginal native tissue surgical techniques Int Urogynecol J 30 1887-1893

[6] van de Pol G(2013)Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013 CD004014-1065

[7] Aalders CI(2018)Hysteropexy: an option for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse Curr Urol Rep 19 15-11

[8] Heintz AP(2019)Effect of vaginal mesh hysteropexy vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: a randomized clinical trial JAMA 322 1054-696

[9] van der Vaart CH(2017)Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study Am J Obstet Gynecol 216 38.e1-637

[10] Dietz V(2021)Database updates and resulting changes in data in study of vaginal mesh hysteropexy vs vaginal hysterectomy JAMA 325 695-1563