Quantifying patch distribution at multiple spatial scales: Applications to wildlife-habitat models

被引:0
作者
Johnson C.J. [1 ,3 ]
Boyce M.S. [1 ]
Mulders R. [2 ]
Gunn A. [2 ]
Gau R.J. [2 ]
Dean Cluff H. [2 ]
Case R.L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Biological Sciences, Z 907 Biological Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton
[2] Government of Northwest Territories, Dept. Rsrc., Wildl. Economic Devmt., Yellowknife, Northwest Territ.
[3] Ecosystem Sci. and Mgmt. Program, Univ. of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC V2N 4Z9
关键词
Canadian Arctic; Habitat; Hierarchy; Landscape pattern; Local quadrat variance; Resource selection; Scale;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-005-0246-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Multiscale analyses are widely employed for wildlife-habitat studies. In most cases, however, each scale is considered discrete and little emphasis is placed on incorporating or measuring the responses of wildlife to resources across multiple scales. We modeled the responses of three Arctic wildlife species to vegetative resources distributed at two spatial scales: patches and collections of patches aggregated across a regional area. We defined a patch as a single or homogeneous collection of pixels representing 1 of 10 unique vegetation types. We employed a spatial pattern technique, three-term local quadrat variance, to quantify the distribution of patches at a larger regional scale. We used the distance at which the variance for each of 10 vegetation types peaked to define a moving window for calculating the density of patches. When measures of vegetation patch and density were applied to resource selection functions, the most parsimonious models for wolves and grizzly bears included covariates recorded at both scales. Seasonal resource selection by caribou was best described using a model consisting of only regional scale covariates. Our results suggest that for some species and environments simple patch-scale models may not capture the full range of spatial variation in resources to which wildlife may respond. For mobile animals that range across heterogeneous areas we recommend selection models that integrate resources occurring at a number of spatial scales. Patch density is a simple technique for representing such higher-order spatial patterns. © 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:869 / 882
页数:13
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Allen T.F.H., Starr T.B., Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity, (1982)
  • [2] Anderson D.R., Burnham K.P., Thompson W.L., Null hypothesis testing: Problems, prevalence, and an alternative, Journal of Wildlife Management, 64, pp. 912-923, (2000)
  • [3] Andrzejewski R., The home-range concept in rodents revised, Acta Theriologica, 47, pp. 81-101, (2002)
  • [4] Apps C.D., McLellan B.N., Kinley T.A., Flaa J.P., Scale-dependent habitat selection by mountain caribou, Columbia Mountains, British Columbia, Journal of Wildlife Management, 65, pp. 65-77, (2001)
  • [5] Arthur S.M., Manly B.F.J., McDonald L.L., Garner G.W., Assessing habitat selection when availability changes, Ecology, 77, pp. 215-227, (1996)
  • [6] Bakker K.K., Naugle D.E., Higgins K.F., Incorporating landscape attributes into models for migratory grassland bird conservation, Conservation Biology, 16, pp. 1638-1646, (2002)
  • [7] Ballard W.B., Reed D.J., Fancy S.G., Krausman P.R., Accuracy, precision, and performance of satellite telemetry for monitoring wolf movements, Ecology and Conservation of Wolves in a Changing World, pp. 461-467, (1995)
  • [8] Baskent E.Z., Jordan G.A., Characterizing spatial structure of forest landscapes, Canadian Journal of Forestry Research, 25, pp. 1830-1849, (1995)
  • [9] Bengtsson J., Fagerstrom T., Rydin H., Competition and coexistence in plant communities, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, pp. 246-250, (1994)
  • [10] Bergin T.M., Habitat selection by the Western Kingbird in western Nebraska: A hierarchical analysis, Condor, 94, pp. 903-911, (1992)