Why do we have lobbying rules? Investigating the introduction of lobbying laws in EU and OECD member states

被引:23
作者
Crepaz M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Political Science, Trinity College Dublin, 3 College Green
关键词
Corporatism; Lobbying; Lobbying regulation; Pluralism; Policy diffusion; Political agenda-setting;
D O I
10.1057/s41309-017-0025-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Why do political systems introduce lobbying rules? Previous literature has analysed the determinants of the introduction of lobbying laws in the US states. However, the last 15 years have witnessed a booming popularity of lobbying laws across the world. Building upon the existing literature, this study seeks to explain the introduction of lobbying laws in EU and OECD member states from 1995 to 2014. The analysis considers variables related to the presence of lobbying scandals, the external promotion by international organizations and corporatism. The causal mechanisms follow the theoretical arguments developed in the literature on political agenda-setting effects, policy diffusion and theories of interest representation. The empirical investigation is based on an original dataset and a statistical investigation using event history analysis and multinomial regression models. The results suggest that policy diffusion variables influence the likelihood of passing lobbying laws. While scandals only affect the presentation of proposals for lobbying regulation in Parliament, corporatism shows no effects on the passage of such laws. © 2017 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 252
页数:21
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Allern E.H., Aylott N., Christiansen F.J., Social Democrats and trade unions in Scandinavia: The decline and persistence of institutional relationships, European Journal of Political Research, 46, 5, pp. 607-635, (2007)
[2]  
Armingeon K., Careja R., Knopfel L., Weisstanner D., Engler S., Potolidis P., Gerber M., Comparative Political Dataset IV 1990-2013, (2016)
[3]  
Bagenholm A., Throwing the rascals out? the electoral effects of corruption allegations and corruption scandals in Europe 1981-2011, Crime, Law and Social Change, 60, 5, pp. 595-609, (2013)
[4]  
Baumgartner F.R., Jones B.D., Leech B.L., Media attention and congressional agendas, Do the Media Govern? Politicians, Voters and Reporters in America, pp. 349-363, (1997)
[5]  
Binderkrantz A.S., Christiansen P.M., From classic to modern corporatism. Interest group representation in Danish public committees in 1975 and 2010, Journal of European Public Policy, 22, 7, pp. 1022-1039, (2015)
[6]  
Bluhdorn I., Sustaining the unsustainable: Symbolic politics and the politics of simulation, Environmental Politics, 16, 2, pp. 251-275, (2007)
[7]  
Bowler S., Private members' bills in the UK Parliament: Is there an 'electoral connection'?, Journal of Legislative Studies, 16, 4, pp. 476-494, (2010)
[8]  
Box-Steffensmeier J.M., Jones B.S., Time is of the essence: Event history models in political science, American Journal of Political Science, 41, 4, pp. 1414-1461, (1997)
[9]  
Chalmers A.W., Interests, influence and information: Comparing the influence of interest groups in the European Union, Journal of European Integration, 33, 4, pp. 471-486, (2011)
[10]  
Chari R., Hogan J., Murphy G., Regulating Lobbying: A Global Comparison, (2010)