Short-term rockburst risk prediction using ensemble learning methods

被引:4
作者
Weizhang Liang
Asli Sari
Guoyan Zhao
Stephen D. McKinnon
Hao Wu
机构
[1] Central South University,School of Resources and Safety Engineering
[2] Queen’s University,The Robert M. Buchan Department of Mining
[3] China University of Mining and Technology,School of Mines
来源
Natural Hazards | 2020年 / 104卷
关键词
Rockburst; Short-term risk; Ensemble learning; Prediction; Microseismic monitoring;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Short-term rockburst risk prediction plays a crucial role in ensuring the safety of workers. However, it is a challenging task in deep rock engineering as it depends on many factors. More recently, machine learning approaches have started to be used to predict rockbursts. In this paper, ensemble learning methods including random forest (RF), adaptive boosting, gradient boosted decision tree (GBDT), extreme gradient boosting and light gradient boosting machine were adopted to predict short-term rockburst risk using microseismic data from the tunnels of Jinping-II hydropower project in China. First, labeled rockburst data with six indicators based on microseismic monitoring were collected. Then, the original rockburst data were randomly divided into training and test sets with a 70/30 sampling strategy. The hyperparameters of the ensemble learning methods were tuned with fivefold cross-validation during training. Finally, the predictive performance of each model was evaluated using classification accuracy, Cohen’s Kappa, precision, recall and F-measure metrics on the test set. The results showed that RF and GBDT possessed better overall performance. RF obtained the highest average accuracy of 0.8000 for all cases, whereas GBDT achieved the highest value for high (moderate and intense) risk cases with an accuracy of 0.9167. The proposed methodology can provide effective guidance for short-term rockburst risk management in deep underground projects.
引用
收藏
页码:1923 / 1946
页数:23
相关论文
共 234 条
  • [1] Afraei S(2018)Statistical assessment of rock burst potential and contributions of considered predictor variables in the task Tunn Undergr Space Technol 72 250-271
  • [2] Shahriar K(1977)Seismicity anomaly prior to a moderate rock burst: a case study Int J Rock Mech Min 14 127-132
  • [3] Madani SH(1996)Bagging predictors Mach Learn 24 123-140
  • [4] Brady BT(2001)Random forests Mach Learn 45 5-32
  • [5] Leighton FW(2018)A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation methodology for rock burst forecasting using microseismic monitoring Tunn Undergr Space Technol 80 232-245
  • [6] Breiman L(2016)Processing of rock core microtomography images: using seven different machine learning algorithms Comput Geosci 86 120-128
  • [7] Breiman L(2015)Rock burst intensity classification based on the radiated energy with damage intensity at Jinping II hydropower station, China Rock Mech Rock Eng 48 289-303
  • [8] Cai W(2019)A gradient boosting decision tree approach for insider trading identification: an empirical model evaluation of China stock market Appl Soft Comput 83 105652-404
  • [9] Dou LM(2019)Formation lithology classification using scalable gradient boosted decision trees Comput Chem Eng 128 392-477
  • [10] Zhang M(2013)Prediction of rockburst classification using random forest Trans Nonferrous Met Soc 23 472-658