The Prostate Health Index aids multi-parametric MRI in diagnosing significant prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Yu-Hua Fan
Po-Hsun Pan
Wei-Ming Cheng
Hsin-Kai Wang
Shu-Huei Shen
Hsian-Tzu Liu
Hao-Min Cheng
Wei-Ren Chen
Tzu-Hao Huang
Tzu-Chun Wei
I-Shen Huang
Chih-Chieh Lin
Eric Y. H. Huang
Hsiao-Jen Chung
William J. S. Huang
Tzu-Ping Lin
机构
[1] Taipei Veterans General Hospital,Department of Urology
[2] National Yang-Ming University,Department of Urology, School of Medicine
[3] National Yang-Ming University,Shu
[4] Taipei City Hospital,Tien Urological Institute
[5] Taipei Veterans General Hospital,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Zhongxiao Branch
[6] Taipei Veterans General Hospital,Department of Radiology
[7] National Yang-Ming University,Center for Evidence
[8] National Yang-Ming University,Based Medicine
[9] National Yang-Ming University,School of Medicine
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To evaluate the performance of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound (MRI-TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). We prospectively enrolled 164 patients with at least one Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) ≥ 3 lesions who underwent MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy. Of the PSA-derived biomarkers, the PHI had the best performance in predicting csPCa (AUC 0.792, CI 0.707–0.877) in patients with PI-RADS 4/5 lesions. Furthermore, the predictive power of PHI was even higher in the patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions (AUC 0.884, CI 0.792–0.976). To minimize missing csPCa, we used a PHI cutoff of 27 and 7.4% of patients with PI-RADS 4/5 lesions could have avoided a biopsy. At this level, 2.0% of cases with csPCa would have been missed, with sensitivity and NPV rates of 98.0% and 87.5%, respectively. However, the subgroup of PI-RADS 3 was too small to define the optimal PHI cutoff. PHI was the best PSA-derived biomarker to predict csPCa in MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsies in men with PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions, especially for the patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions who gained the most value.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A statistical comparison of multi-parametric MR for prostate cancer
    Chan, IH
    Haker, SJ
    Mulkern, RV
    Zou, KH
    Zhang, J
    Maler, SE
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 647 - 647
  • [42] Addressing image misalignments in multi-parametric prostate MRI for enhanced computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Balint Kovacs
    Nils Netzer
    Michael Baumgartner
    Adrian Schrader
    Fabian Isensee
    Cedric Weißer
    Ivo Wolf
    Magdalena Görtz
    Paul F. Jaeger
    Victoria Schütz
    Ralf Floca
    Regula Gnirs
    Albrecht Stenzinger
    Markus Hohenfellner
    Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
    David Bonekamp
    Klaus H. Maier-Hein
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [43] Addressing image misalignments in multi-parametric prostate MRI for enhanced computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Kovacs, Balint
    Netzer, Nils
    Baumgartner, Michael
    Schrader, Adrian
    Isensee, Fabian
    Weisser, Cedric
    Wolf, Ivo
    Goertz, Magdalena
    Jaeger, Paul F.
    Schuetz, Victoria
    Floca, Ralf
    Gnirs, Regula
    Stenzinger, Albrecht
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Bonekamp, David
    Maier-Hein, Klaus H.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [44] Logistic regression model for diagnosis of transition zone prostate cancer on multi-parametric MRI
    Dikaios, Nikolaos
    Alkalbani, Jokha
    Sidhu, Harbir Singh
    Fujiwara, Taiki
    Abd-Alazeez, Mohamed
    Kirkham, Alex
    Allen, Clare
    Ahmed, Hashim
    Emberton, Mark
    Freeman, Alex
    Halligan, Steve
    Taylor, Stuart
    Atkinson, David
    Punwani, Shonit
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (02) : 523 - 532
  • [45] Accuracy of multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) for detection of significant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy (RP) - an analysis of index lesion detection and staging in a regional centre
    Kam, J.
    Yuminaga, Y.
    Khoury, S.
    Macneil, F.
    Ouyang, R.
    Ruthven, S.
    Louie-Johnsun, M.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 : 44 - 44
  • [46] Development of a Computer Aided Diagnosis Model for Prostate Cancer Classification on Multi-Parametric MRI
    Alfano, R.
    Soetemans, D.
    Bauman, G. S.
    Gibson, E.
    Gaed, M.
    Moussa, M.
    Gomez, J. A.
    Chin, J. L.
    Pautler, S.
    Ward, A. D.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2018: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2018, 10575
  • [47] Multi-parametric MRI-Pathologic correlation of prostate cancer using tracked biopsies
    Xu, Sheng
    Turkbey, Baris
    Kruecker, Jochen
    Yan, Pingkun
    Locklin, Julia
    Pinto, Peter
    Choyke, Peter
    Wood, Bradford
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2010: VISUALIZATION, IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, AND MODELING, 2010, 7625
  • [48] SE-Mask-RCNN: segmentation method for prostate cancer on multi-parametric MRI
    Huang Y.-P.
    Hu J.-S.
    Qian X.-S.
    Zhou Z.-Y.
    Zhao W.-L.
    Ma Q.
    Shen J.-K.
    Dai Y.-K.
    Zhejiang Daxue Xuebao (Gongxue Ban)/Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2021, 55 (01): : 203 - 212
  • [49] Incorporating Oxygen-Enhanced MRI into Multi-Parametric Assessment of Human Prostate Cancer
    Zhou, Heling
    Hallac, Rami R.
    Yuan, Qing
    Ding, Yao
    Zhang, Zhongwei
    Xie, Xian-Jin
    Francis, Franto
    Roehrborn, Claus G.
    Sims, R. Douglas
    Costa, Daniel N.
    Raj, Ganesh V.
    Mason, Ralph P.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2017, 7 (03):
  • [50] A classification approach to prostate cancer localization in 3T Multi-Parametric MRI
    Trigui, Rania
    Miteran, Johel
    Sellami, Lamia
    Walker, Paul
    Ben Hamida, Ahmed
    2016 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES FOR SIGNAL AND IMAGE PROCESSING (ATSIP), 2016, : 113 - 118