Assisted Reproduction: Managing an Unruly Technology

被引:0
作者
Mairi Levitt
机构
[1] University of Central Lancashire,Centre for Professional Ethics
来源
Health Care Analysis | 2004年 / 12卷
关键词
assisted reproduction; liberalisation; regulation; technology; unruliness;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Technology is “unruly” because it operates in a social context where it is shaped by institutions, organisations and individuals in ways not envisaged when it was first developed. In the UK assisted reproductive technology has developed from strictly circumscribed beginnings as a treatment for infertility within the NHS, to a service which is more often offered by commercial clinics and purchased by clients who are not necessarily infertile. The article considers the process by which assisted reproductive technology has been created and developed, a process which is ideological rather than technical, and the social implications of its ever expanding use. In a society where the discourse around reproduction and family life is one of choice and acceptance of diversity of life styles, the conditions are set for further “unruliness” supported by clinicians and commercial interests. The HFEA, public consultations and media coverage tend to subscribe to the way ethical issues are framed by those interested parties, an approach that favours increased liberalisation.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 49
页数:8
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Barns I.(1996)Manufacturing Consensus: Reflections on the UK National Consensus Conference on Plant Biotechnology Science As Culture 5 119-216
[2]  
Clarke A.(1991)Is Non-Directive Genetic Counselling Possible? Lancet 338 998-1000
[3]  
Dickins B.M.(2002)Can Sex Selection be Ethically Tolerated [Editorial]? Journal of Medical Ethics 28 335-336
[4]  
Levitt M.(2001)Not so Wrong That we are Prepared to Threaten the Entire Service: The regulation of Reproductive Technologies in the UK Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 7 45-51
[5]  
Mitchie S.(1997)Nondirectivenesss in Genetic Counselling: An Empirical Study American Journal of Human Genetics 60 40-47
[6]  
Bron F.(2002)Reproductive Tourism as Moral Pluralism in Motion Journal of Medical Ethics 28 337-341
[7]  
Bobrow M.(2002)Health Risks in Babies Born After Assisted Reproduction BMJ 325 117-118
[8]  
Marteau T.(1988)Unruly Technology. Practical Rules, Impractical Discourses and Public Understanding Social Studies of Science 18 147-167
[9]  
Pennings G.(2001)Creating Public Alienation: Expert Cultures of Risk and Ethics on GMOs Science as Culture 10 445-481
[10]  
Sutcliffe A.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined