Towards a learning-oriented assessment to improve students’ learning—a critical review of literature

被引:4
作者
Wenjie Zeng
Fuquan Huang
Lu Yu
Siyu Chen
机构
[1] South China Normal University,The Centre for Research and Development of Values Learning
[2] Southwest University,Faculty of Education
来源
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability | 2018年 / 30卷
关键词
Students’ learning; Learning-oriented assessment; Assessment for learning; Assessment as learning; Assessment of learning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Learning-oriented assessment (LOA), a concept coined by Carless, has emerged in Europe, Canada, the USA, and the Asia-Pacific Region as an alternative assessment methodology. LOA evolved from both summative assessment and formative assessment, and its framework comprises three integrated components, assessment for learning, assessment as learning, and assessment of learning. While a few studies have provided information about the connections among assessment for, of, and as learning, the purpose of this review is to summarize what is state of the art of LOA, and we aim to examine the history and the nature as well as the strategy of developing LOA. We conducted a transformed critical review of LOA to address these questions. To be specific, the related studies were searched between January 1971 and December 2016, using specific inclusion criteria to remove irrelevant documents. Results provide the publication types of the selected studies and the reported approaches to LOA, trace the evolution of classroom assessment from summative and formative assessment to LOA in order to clarify the historical foundations of LOA, and indicate its nature from the dimensions of components, functions, conceptual frameworks, and principles, as well as to illustrate strategies for using it in the classroom. The findings of a deep analysis of 48 publications were then used to define a holistic framework for LOA and a dynamic framework for its development and also yield important recommendations for practice and future research. Finally, we propose the conclusion.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 250
页数:39
相关论文
共 176 条
  • [1] Abdul Aziz MN(2016)Improving process writing with the use authentic assessment International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education 5 200-204
  • [2] Yusoff N(2009)Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) Computers and Education 52 154-168
  • [3] Angeli C(2006)Active/cooperative learning in schools Journal of Biological Education 40 130-134
  • [4] Valanides N(2017)The beneficial impacts of applying formative assessment on Iranian University students’ anxiety reduction and listening efficacy International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching 5 1-11
  • [5] Bandiera M(2008)Active learning: effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability Journal of Applied Psychology 93 296-316
  • [6] Bruno C(2011)Formative assessment: a critical review Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice 18 5-25
  • [7] Bayat A(2017)Beyond measurement-driven instruction: achieving deep learning based on constructivist learning theory, integrated assessment, and a flipped classroom approach Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 28 111-132
  • [8] Jamshidipour A(2015)Assessment innovation and student experience: a new assessment challenge and call for a multi-perspective approach to assessment research Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 40 103-119
  • [9] Hashemi M(2010)What it means to be an accounting professor: a concise career guide for doctoral students in accounting Issues in Accounting Education 25 227-244
  • [10] Bell B(2013)Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance Computers and Education 62 102-110