The role of opioid receptor antagonists in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation: a review

被引:0
作者
Wojciech Leppert
机构
[1] Poznan University of Medical Sciences,Chair and Department of Palliative Medicine
来源
Advances in Therapy | 2010年 / 27卷
关键词
constipation; laxatives; opioids; opioid-induced constipation; opioid receptor antagonists; treatment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is associated with negative impact of opioid analgesics on opioid receptors located in the gut wall. Until recently, OIC was treated symptomatically only, with different laxatives which did not target the pathophysiology of OIC. Recently, several opioid receptor antagonists have been introduced in the treatment of OIC. Methylnaltrexone (MNTX) is a peripheral mu-opioid receptor antagonist for subcutaneous administration, which does not evoke symptoms of opioid abstinence. MNTX is indicated for patients with OIC who are not amenable to therapy with oral laxatives. In clinical trials, the effectiveness of MNTX assessed as its ability to induce spontaneous bowel movement, is 50%–60% of treated patients; MNTX demonstrates significant superiority over placebo. Another product is combination of oral formulation of prolonged release oxycodone and prolonged release naloxone (PR oxycodone/PR naloxone), indicated for patients who require opioid administration for chronic pain and have already developed OIC, and for those who need opioid therapy and take the drug to prevent OIC. Naloxone administered orally displays local, antagonist effects on opioid receptors in the gut wall, negligible systemic bioavailability, and significantly reduces the oxycodone constipating effect. PR oxycodone/PR naloxone has similar analgesic efficacy, but causes less constipation and less laxative consumption in comparison with patients treated with oxycodone alone. Both products are expensive, therefore their administration should be carefully considered. On the other hand, uncontrolled OIC and the necessity to perform rectal invasive procedures (enema, manual evacuation) lead not only to increased health care costs, but most importantly, cause severe patient suffering.
引用
收藏
页码:714 / 730
页数:16
相关论文
共 200 条
[1]  
Pappagallo M.(2001)Incidence, prevalence, and management of opioid bowel dysfunction Am J Surg. 182 11S-18S
[2]  
Larkin P.J.(2008)The management of constipation in palliative care: clinical practice recommendations Palliat Med. 22 796-807
[3]  
Sykes N.P.(2006)The pathogenesis of constipation J Support Oncol. 4 213-218
[4]  
Centeno C.(1998)The relationship between opioid use and laxative use in terminally ill cancer patients Palliat Med. 12 375-382
[5]  
Sykes N.(2000)Objawy ze strony ukladu pokarmowego u chorych z zaawansowana choroba nowotworowa Nowa Med. 97 18-39
[6]  
Sykes N.(2009)Postepowanie u chorych z zaparciem stolca w medycynie paliatywnej — zalecenia Grupy Roboczej Ekspertow Polskiego Towarzystwa Medycyny Paliatywnej Medycyna Paliatywna 1 1-10
[7]  
Leppert W.(2006)Validation of the PAC-SYM questionnaire for opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic low back pain Eur J Pain 10 209-217
[8]  
Kozikowska J.(2009)A randomised controlled trial with prolonged-release oral oxycodone and naloxone to prevent and reverse opioid-induced constipation Eur J Pain 13 56-64
[9]  
Luczak J.(2008)Ocena analgezji i objawow niepozadanych tramadolu i dihydrokodeiny o kontrolowanym uwalnianiu u chorych z bolem nowotworowym — na podstawie zmodyfikowanej skali ESAS Wspolcz Onkol. 12 246-254
[10]  
Glowacka A.(2006)Opioid-induced constipation — a frequent and distressing side effect in daily practice affecting oral and transdermal opioid applications Eur J Pain 10 S172-17