Predicting reading disabilities using dynamic assessment of decoding before and after the onset of reading instruction: a longitudinal study from kindergarten through grade 2

被引:0
作者
Anna S. Gellert
Carsten Elbro
机构
[1] University of Copenhagen,Centre for Reading Research, Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics
来源
Annals of Dyslexia | 2018年 / 68卷
关键词
Decoding; Dynamic assessment; Early identification; Prediction; Reading disabilities;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The present study examined the predictive validity of a dynamic test of decoding in which participants are taught three novel letters and how to synthesize the corresponding letter sounds into new words. One version of this dynamic test was administered to 158 kindergarten children before the onset of formal reading instruction along with traditional predictors of reading. Similarly, a parallel version of the dynamic test was administered to the same children after a few months of formal reading instruction. At the end of grade 2, the children were assessed on outcome measures of reading and categorized as having disabilities with either accuracy or fluency measures. Administered before as well as after the onset of formal reading instruction, the dynamic test of decoding contributed uniquely to the prediction of difficulties with reading accuracy at the end of grade 2 after control for traditional predictors of reading. Difficulties with reading fluency were also predicted by the dynamic decoding test, but the unique prediction value was more limited. This study showed that a dynamic assessment of decoding can be a useful addition to traditional test batteries for early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities. Even when taken before formal reading instruction, a combination of the dynamic assessment and two traditional measures (letter knowledge and rapid automatized naming) yielded a very high prediction accuracy of reading difficulties at the end of grade 2.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 144
页数:18
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] Bailey AL(2006)Who is at risk and why? Teachers’ reasons for concern and their understanding and assessment of early literacy Educational Assessment 11 149-178
  • [2] Drummond KV(2008)The predictive validity of dynamic assessment: a review Journal of Special Education 41 254-270
  • [3] Caffrey E(2015)Early identification of reading disabilities within an RTI framework Journal of Learning Disabilities 48 281-297
  • [4] Fuchs D(2009)Floor effects associated with universal screening and their impact on the early identification of reading disabilities Journal of Learning Disabilities 42 163-176
  • [5] Fuchs LS(2017)Development of first-graders’ word reading skills: for whom can dynamic assessment tell us more? Journal of Learning Disabilities 50 95-112
  • [6] Catts HW(2006)Selecting at-risk readers in first grade for early intervention: A two-year longitudinal study of decision rules and procedures Journal of Educational Psychology 98 394-409
  • [7] Nielsen DC(2010)Selecting at-risk first-grade readers for early intervention: eliminating false positives and exploring the promise of a two-stage gated screening process Journal of Educational Psychology 102 327-340
  • [8] Bridges MS(2007)Phonological awareness and the use of phonological similarity in letter–sound learning Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 98 131-152
  • [9] Liu YS(1998)Predicting dyslexia from kindergarten: the importance of distinctness of phonological representations of lexical items Reading Research Quarterly 33 36-60
  • [10] Bontempo DE(2012)Dyslexia in a second language?-a dynamic test of reading acquisition may provide a fair answer Annals of Dyslexia 62 172-185