Rapid identification of uropathogens by combining Alfred 60 system with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry technology

被引:0
作者
Abed Athamna
Albira Zbriger
Stella Avadov
Maanit Shapira
Yana Tal
Sarit Freimann
机构
[1] Hillel Yaffe Medical Center,Clinical Microbiology Laboratory
[2] Hillel Yaffe Medical Center,Laboratory Division
[3] Hillel Yaffe Medical Center,Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory
来源
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases | 2020年 / 39卷
关键词
Uropathogens; Rapid identification; Alfred 60 system; MALDI-TOF;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Rapid identification of uropathogens is needed to determine appropriate antimicrobial therapy. This study evaluated performance of the Alfred 60 system combined with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) technology for rapid identification of uropathogens. The Alfred 60 system was used to screen urine cultures, followed by identifying the microbial pathogen in positive cultures using MALDI-TOF MS. The Alfred 60 detected positive cultures by measuring the turbidity of urine samples, which were transferred automatically to vials containing liquid medium and incubated for 3.5 h at 35 °C in the Alfred 60 system. Vials that showed growth were removed and centrifuged. The pellet was subjected to MALDI-TOF MS identification. In parallel, positive urine samples were inoculated onto agar plates for identification by conventional culture. The time required to detect positive urine cultures with Alfred 60 and identify the uropathogens with MALDI-TOF MS ranged from 15 min to 3.5 h. Among 146 positive urine samples tested, conventional cultures showed three culture groups: group 1 included 101 samples with growth of a single type of microorganism; group 2 included 34 samples with 2 types of microorganisms; and group 3 included 11 samples with ≥ 3 types of microorganisms. Direct identification by MALDI-TOF MS was concordant with 95% of the samples in group 1, 100% of the principal microorganism in group 2, but could not identify microorganisms in group 3. This combination of methods provides rapid, reliable microbial identification for most positive urine cultures.
引用
收藏
页码:1855 / 1863
页数:8
相关论文
共 160 条
[1]  
Foxman B(2002)Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: incidence, morbidity, and economic costs Am J Med 8 5S-13S
[2]  
Foxman B(2000)Urinary tract infection: self-reported incidence and associated costs Ann Epidemiol 10 509-515
[3]  
Barlow R(2007)Diagnostic accuracy of criteria for urinary tract infection in a cohort of nursing home residents J Am Geriatr Soc 55 1072-1077
[4]  
D’Arcy H(2002)Scientific and clinical challenges in the management of urinary tract infections Am J Med 113 1-4
[5]  
Gillespie B(2003)Inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy and its effect on survival in a clinical trial of immunomodulating therapy for severe sepsis Am J Med 115 529-535
[6]  
Sobel JD(2007)Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 urine cell analyzer as a screening test to reduce the need for urine cultures for community-acquired urinary tract infection Am J Clin Pathol 128 922-925
[7]  
Juthani-Mehta M(1987)Clinical relevance of culture versus screens for the detection of microbial pathogens in urine specimens Am J Med 83 739-745
[8]  
Tinetti M(2000)Detection of significant bacteriuria by automated urinalysis using flow cytometry J Clin Microbiol 38 2870-2872
[9]  
Perrelli E(2017)Direct detection and identification of bacterial pathogens from urine with optimized specimen processing and enhanced testing algorithm J Clin Microbiol 55 1488-1495
[10]  
Towle V(2009)Cutoff values for bacteria and leukocytes for urine flow cytometer Sysmex UF-1000i in urinary tract infections Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 65 103-107