Views and Experiences of People with Intellectual Disabilities Regarding Intimate Relationships: A Qualitative Metasynthesis

被引:0
作者
Brad English
Anna Tickle
Roshan dasNair
机构
[1] University of Nottingham,Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology
[2] University of Nottingham,C22, Institute of Mental Health
来源
Sexuality and Disability | 2018年 / 36卷
关键词
Intellectual disabilities; Intimate relationships; Romance; Couples; Metasynthesis; United Kingdom;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aims of this review were to systematically identify, critically appraise and synthesize the results of existing qualitative literature exploring the views and experiences of intimate relationships amongst people with intellectual disabilities. Fourteen peer-reviewed articles were identified through a systematic search of eight databases, reference lists, citations, and relevant journals. The identified articles were appraised for quality, then synthesized using a metaethnography approach. No study met all quality criteria and references to ethical approval were often lacking. Interpretation of the findings suggested three key themes: the meaning of intimate relationships, external constraints and facilitators, and managing external constraints. Though many people with intellectual disabilities desire and benefit from intimate relationships, they experience restrictions that others do not, which can lead to isolation and loneliness. Intimate relationships are not always necessarily linked with sexual behavior; therefore, intimate relationships warrant their own focus in future research, as well as in education and training for people with intellectual disabilities and their caregivers. Within this, a commitment to transparency over research processes is needed, in particular with reference to how ethical approval was obtained, since this has been a shortcoming of research with this focus to date.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 173
页数:24
相关论文
共 174 条
[1]  
Szollos AA(1995)The sexuality of people with mild intellectual disability: perceptions of clients and caregivers Aust. N. Z. J. Dev. Disabil. 20 205-222
[2]  
McCabe MP(1983)Social role valorization: a proposed new term for the principle of normalization Ment. Retard. 21 234-405
[3]  
Wolfensberger W(2002)Integrating supports in assessment and planning Ment. Retard. 40 390-886
[4]  
Thompson JR(2014)What difficulties are experienced by caregivers in relation to the sexuality of people with intellectual disabilities? A qualitative meta-synthesis Res. Dev. Disabil. 35 871-921
[5]  
Hughes C(2009)Sexuality and personal relationships for people with an intellectual disability. Part II: staff and family carer perspectives J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 53 913-14
[6]  
Schalock RL(2011)Attitudes to sexuality of patients with learning disabilities: a review Br. J. Nurs. 20 8-207
[7]  
Silverman W(2004)“May I?” About sexuality and love in the new generation with intellectual disabilities Sex. Disabil. 22 197-97
[8]  
Tassé MJ(2000)Staff attitudes to sexuality and people with intellectual disabilities Ir. J. Psychol. 21 88-144
[9]  
Bryant B(1994)‘An ordinary sexual life?’: a review of the normalisation principle as it applies to the sexual options of people with learning disabilities Disabil. Soc. 9 123-105
[10]  
Craig EM(2015)‘As normal as possible’: sexual identity development in people with intellectual disabilities transitioning to adulthood Sex. Disabil. 33 93-141