A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials

被引：105
作者：
Handschel J. [1 ]
Simonowska M. [1 ]
Naujoks C. [1 ]
Depprich R.A. [1 ]
Ommerborn M.A. [2 ]
Meyer U. [1 ]
Kübler N.R. [2 ]
机构：
[1] Department for Cranio- and Maxillofacial Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, D-40225 Düsseldorf
[2] Department for Operative and Preventive Dentistry and Endodontics, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, D-40225 Düsseldorf
来源：
Head & Face Medicine | / 5卷 / 1期
关键词：
Autogenous Bone; Osteogenic Cell; Bovine Bone; Sinus Floor; Bone Grafting Material;
D O I：
10.1186/1746-160X-5-12
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Several grafting materials have been used in sinus augmentation procedures including autogenous bone, demineralized freeze-dried bone (DFDBA), hydroxyapatite, -tricalcium phosphate (-TCP), anorganic deproteinized bovine bone and combination of these and others. Up to now a subject of controversy in maxillofacial surgery and dentistry is, what is the most appropriate graft material for sinus floor augmentation. Purpose. The aim of this study is to provide a body of evidence-based data regarding grafting materials in external sinus floor elevation concerning the fate of the augmented material at the histomorphological level, through a meta-analysis of the available literature. Materials and methods. The literature searches were performed using the National Library of Medicine. The search covered all English and German literature from 1995 until 2006. For analyzing the amount of bone the parameter "Total Bone Volume" (TBV) was assessed. TBV is determined as the percentage of the section consisting of bone tissue. Results. In a relatively early phase after implantation the autogenous bone shows the highest TBV values. Interestingly, the different TBV levels approximate during the time. After 9 months no statistically significant differences can be detected between the various grafting materials. Conclusion. From a clinical point of view, the use of autogenous bone is advantageous if a prosthetic rehabilitation (with functional loading) is expected within 9 months. In other cases the use of anorganic deproteinized bovine bone in combination with autogenous bone seems to be preferable. Donor side morbidity is ignored in this conclusion. © 2009 Handschel et al.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Boyne P.J., James R.A., Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone, Journal of Oral Surgery, 38, 8, pp. 613-616, (1980)
[2]  
Tatum Jr. H., Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions, Dent Clin North Am, 30, 2, pp. 207-229, (1986)
[3]  
Block M.S., Kent J.N., Sinus augmentation for dental implants: The use of autogenous bone, J Oral Maxillofac Surg., 55, 11, pp. 1281-1286, (1997)
[4]  
Nishibori M., Betts N.J., Salama H., Listgarten M.A., Short-term healing of autogenous and allogeneic bone grafts after sinus augmentation: A report of 2 cases, J Periodontol, 65, 10, pp. 958-966, (1994)
[5]  
Wetzel A.C., Stich H., Caffesse R.G., Bone apposition onto oral implants in the sinus area filled with different grafting materials. A histological study in beagle dogs, Clinical Oral Implants Research, 6, pp. 155-163, (1995)
[6]  
Wheeler S.L., Holmes R.E., Calhoun C.J., Six-Year Clinical and Histologic Study of Sinus-Lift Grafts, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 11, 1, pp. 26-34, (1996)
[7]  
Szabo G., Huys L., Coulthard P., Maiorana C., Garagiola U., Barabas J., Nemeth Z., Hrabak K., Suba Z., A prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial of autogenous bone versus β-tricalcium phosphate graft alone for bilateral sinus elevation: Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 20, 3, pp. 371-381, (2005)
[8]  
Imbronito A.V., Scarano A., Orsini G., Piattelli A., Arana-Chavez V.E., Ultrastructure of bone healing in defects grafted with a copolymer of polylactic/polyglycolic acids, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A, 74, 2, pp. 215-221, (2005)
[9]  
Velich N., Nemeth Z., Toth C., Szabo G., Long-term results with different bone substitutes used for sinus floor elevation, J Craniofac Surg., 15, 1, pp. 38-41, (2004)
[10]  
Jensen O.T., Shulman L.B., Block M.S., Iacono V.J., Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp. 11-45, (1998)
123456