Co-evolution of seed size and seed predation

被引:0
作者
Stefan a.H. Geritz
机构
[1] Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological Sciences,The Netherlands and Collegium Budapest, Institute for Advanced Study, Szentháronság utca 2
[2] Kaiserstraat 63,undefined
[3] NL-2311 GP Leiden,undefined
来源
Evolutionary Ecology | 1998年 / 12卷
关键词
co-evolution; evolutionarily stable strategy model; seed polymorphism; seed predation; seed size;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Using the evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) approach in a model for the co-evolution of seed size and seed predation, I show that seed size variation within individual plants is favoured if there is a trade-off in the predator's attack rate for different seed sizes. A single seed size is not evolutionarily stable because a predator that is optimally adapted to one particular seed size cannot prevent invasion by plants with a different seed size. The model generates the following predictions. The ESS consists of a continuous range of seed sizes. Small seeds tend to be attacked more frequently than big seeds. Plants with many resources and plants with low (frequency-independent) juvenile mortality have more variable seeds than plants with few resources and a high juvenile mortality. Seed size variation is higher in fluctuating populations regulated by seed predation alone than in stable populations (partially) regulated by seedling competition. Predator searching behaviour does not directly affect the ESS seed size range, but may have an indirect effect by affecting population stability or the significance of seedling competition as a population regulating mechanism. Moreover, seed size distributions are found to be more skewed in favour of small seeds if predation is spatially non-uniform than if predation is more even. Application of the model to systems of several co-evolving plant and predator species is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:891 / 911
页数:20
相关论文
共 123 条
[1]  
Ågren K.(1989)Seed size and number in Rubus chamaemorus: Between-habitat variation, and effects of defoliation and supplemental pollination J. Ecol 77 1080-1092
[2]  
Andersson S.(1990)Paternal effects on seed size in a population of Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae) Oikos 59 3-8
[3]  
Bell G.(1991)The ecology and genetics of fitness in forest plants. III. Environmental variance in natural populations of J. Ecol 79 697-713
[4]  
Lechowicz M.J.(1978)A generalized war of attrition J. Theor. Biol 70 85-124
[5]  
Schoen D.J.(1958)Competition of plants of different initial seed sizes in swards of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) with particular reference to leaf area and the light microclimate Austr. J. Agric. Res 9 299-318
[6]  
Bishop D.T.(1983)The heritability of external morphology in Darwin's ground finches (Geospiza) on Isla Daphne Major, Galaápagos Evolution 37 877-894
[7]  
Cannings C.(1981)Intense natural selection in a population of Darwin's ground finches ( Science 214 82-85
[8]  
Black J.N.(1991)) on Isla Daphne Major, Galaápagos Evol. Ecol 5 12-29
[9]  
Boag P.T.(1992)Life history evolution of seed-bank annuals in response to seed pre-dation Evolution 46 1269-1283
[10]  
Boag P.T.(1981)Organization of predator-prey communities as an evolutionary game Am. Nat 117 923-943