Kinetic Simulation of Collisional Magnetized Plasmas with Semi-implicit Time Integration

被引:0
作者
Debojyoti Ghosh
Mikhail A. Dorf
Milo R. Dorr
Jeffrey A. F. Hittinger
机构
[1] Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,Center for Applied Scientific Computing
[2] Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,Physics Division
来源
Journal of Scientific Computing | 2018年 / 77卷
关键词
IMEX time integration; Plasma physics; Gyrokinetic simulations; Vlasov–Fokker–Planck equations;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Plasmas with varying collisionalities occur in many applications, such as tokamak edge regions, where the flows are characterized by significant variations in density and temperature. While a kinetic model is necessary for weakly-collisional high-temperature plasmas, high collisionality in colder regions render the equations numerically stiff due to disparate time scales. In this paper, we propose an implicit–explicit algorithm for such cases, where the collisional term is integrated implicitly in time, while the advective term is integrated explicitly in time, thus allowing time step sizes that are comparable to the advective time scales. This partitioning results in a more efficient algorithm than those using explicit time integrators, where the time step sizes are constrained by the stiff collisional time scales. We implement semi-implicit additive Runge–Kutta methods in COGENT, a high-order finite-volume gyrokinetic code and test the accuracy, convergence, and computational cost of these semi-implicit methods for test cases with highly-collisional plasmas.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 849
页数:30
相关论文
共 244 条
  • [1] Ascher UM(1997)Implicit–explicit Runge–Kutta methods for time-dependent partial differential equations Appl. Numer. Math. 25 151-167
  • [2] Ruuth SJ(2016)Vlasov simulations of electron-ion collision effects on damping of electron plasma waves Phys. Plasmas 23 032108-174
  • [3] Spiteri RJ(2012)Full linearized Fokker–Planck collisions in neoclassical transport simulations Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 54 015015-245
  • [4] Banks JW(1987)Conservative finite-difference schemes for the Fokker–Planck equation not violating the law of an increasing entropy J. Comput. Phys. 69 163-322
  • [5] Brunner S(1965)Transport processes in a plasma Rev. Plasma Phys. 1 205-2146
  • [6] Berger RL(1998)Conservative and entropy decaying numerical scheme for the isotropic Fokker–Planck–Landau equation J. Comput. Phys. 145 228-653
  • [7] Tran TM(1997)Fast algorithms for numerical, conservative, and entropy approximations of the Fokker–Planck–Landau equation J. Comput. Phys. 133 310-682
  • [8] Belli EA(2003)Anomalous transport scaling in the DIII-D tokamak matched by supercomputer simulation Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 045001-16
  • [9] Candy J(1991)Kinetic simulation of a collisional shock wave in a plasma Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 2143-2402
  • [10] Berezin Y(2000)An implicit energy-conservative 2D Fokker–Planck algorithm: I. Difference scheme J. Comput. Phys. 157 618-87