Should highly cited items be excluded in impact factor calculation? The effect of review articles on journal impact factor

被引：0
作者：
Lei Lei
Yunmei Sun
机构：
[1] Huazhong University of Science and Technology,School of Foreign Languages
来源：
Scientometrics | 2020年 / 122卷
关键词：
Review articles; Impact factor; Highly cited articles;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The use of the journal impact factor for evaluation purposes has been widely challenged because of the simplistic algorithm involved in impact factor calculation. As a result, a journal's impact factor may be affected by many variables, such as highly cited review articles. In the present study, we aimed to investigate whether and to what extent review articles affect the impact factors of journals. We examined the citations of original research articles and review articles in the field of physics, and compared the impact factors of the journals Science, Nature, and Cell with and without citation counts of review articles included. The results showed that review articles consistently received higher numbers of citations than did original research articles. In addition, review articles accounted for 3–10% of the impact factors of these top journals. Based on our findings, we suggest that sophisticated methods, in addition to the impact factor, be employed for research evaluation purposes.
引用
收藏
页码：1697 / 1706
页数：9
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Abbott BP(2017)GW170104: Observation of a 50-solar-mass binary black hole coalescence at redshift 0.2 Physical Review Letters 118 221101-1035
[2]  
Abbott R(2017)GW170814: A three-detector observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole coalescence Physical Review Letters 119 141101-604
[3]  
Abbott TD(2017)GW170817: Observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral Physical Review Letters 119 161101-226
[4]  
Acernese F(2017)Results from a search for dark matter in the complete LUX exposure Physical Review Letters 118 21303-106
[5]  
Ackley K(2018)Do review articles boost journal impact factors? A longitudinal analysis for five pharmacology journals Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology 391 1033-479
[6]  
Adams C(2018)Critical rationalism and the search for standard (field-normalized) indicators in bibliometrics Journal of Informetrics 12 598-93
[7]  
Zweizig J(2010)Metrics: Journal’s impact factor skewed by a single paper Nature 466 179-674
[8]  
Abbott BP(2008)The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation Archivum Immunologiae Et Therapiae Experimentalis 56 223-431
[9]  
Abbott R(2013)Implications of a single highly cited article on a journal and its citation indexes: A tale of two journals Accountability in Research 20 93-1372
[10]  
Abbott TD(1972)Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation Science 178 471-1276
123456789