Parameters affecting primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants; [Einfluss der Insertionsparameter auf die Primärstabilität orthodontischer Mini-Implantate]

被引：216

作者：

Wilmes B. ^{[1
]}

Rademacher C. ^{[1
]}

Olthoff G. ^{[1
]}

Drescher D. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Orthodontics, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5

来源：

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | 2006年 / 67卷 / 3期

关键词：

Implant-fracture; Mini-implants; Orthodontic anchorage; Primary stability;

D O I：

10.1007/s00056-006-0611-z

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Aim: Treatment options in orthodontics have been expanded by skeletal anchorage via mini-implants over the last few years. Sufficient primary stability is imperative to minimize implant loss rate. The aim of this study was to quantitatively analyze the factors influencing primary stability: bone quality, implant-design, diameter, and depth of pilot drilling. Material and methods: Thirty-six pelvic bone segments (ilium) of country pigs were dissected and embedded in resin. To determine the primary stability, we measured the insertion torque of five different mini-implant types (tomas®-pin [Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany] 08 and 10 mm, and Dual Top [Jeil Medical Corporation, Seoul, Korea] 1.6 × 8 and 10 mm plus 2 × 10 mm). Twenty-five or 30 implants were inserted into each pelvic bone segment following preparation of the implant sites using pilot drill diameters of 1.0, 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 mm and pilot drill depths of 1, 2, 3, 6 and 10 mm. Five implants were inserted for reference purposes to establish comparability. Thicknesses of bone compacta were measured via micro-computer tomography. Results: Insertion torques of orthodontic mini-implants and therefore primary stability varied greatly, depending on bone quality, implant-design, and preparation of implant site. Compared with the tomas®-pin, the Dual Top screw showed significantlygreater primary stability. Torque moments beyond 230 Nmm caused fractures of 9 Dual Top screws. Conclusion: Compacta thickness, implant design and implant site preparation have a strong impact on the primary stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage. Depending on the insertion site and local bone quality, the clinician should choose an optimum combination of implant and pilot-drilling diameter and depth. © Urban & Vogel 2006.

引用

页码：162 / 174

页数：12

共 26 条

[1]

Adell R., Lekholm U., Rockler B., Et al., A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw, Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp. 387-416, (1981)

[2]

Albrektsson T., Zarb G., Worthington P., Et al., The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1, pp. 11-25, (1986)

[3]

Berens A., Wiechmann D., Rudiger J., Skeletal anchorage in orthodontics with mini- and microsrews, Int Orthod, 3, pp. 325-343, (2005)

[4]

Cheng S.J., Tseng I.Y., Lee J.J., Et al., A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp. 100-106, (2004)

[5]

Costa A., Raffaini M., Melsen B., Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: A preliminary report, Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg, 13, pp. 201-209, (1998)

[6]

Da Cunha H.A., Francischone C.E., Filho H.N., Et al., A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency in the assessment of primary stability and final torque capacity of standard and TiUnite single-tooth im-plants under immediate loading, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp. 578-585, (2004)

[7]

Dhert W.J., Verheyen C.C., Braak L.H., Et al., A finite element analysis of the push-out test: Influence of test conditions, J Biomed Mater Res, 26, pp. 119-130, (1992)

[8]

Diedrich P., Kieferorthopädische Behandlung Erwachsener, Praxis Der Zahnheilkunde. Kieferorthopädie III, pp. 174-208, (2000)

[9]

Freudenthaler J.W., Haas R., Bantleon H.P., Bicortical titanium screws for critical orthodontic anchorage in the mandible: A preliminary report on clinical applications, Clin Oral Implants Res, 12, pp. 358-363, (2001)

[10]

Friberg B., Sennerby L., Meredith N., Et al., A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20-month clinical study, Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 28, pp. 297-303, (1999)

← 1 2 3 →