Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of different reading strategies implementing artificial intelligence

[1] Zackrisson S(2018)One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study Lancet Oncol 19 1493-1503

[2] Lång K(2018)Performance of breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis: results from the prospective population-based Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial Breast Cancer Res Treat 169 489-496

[3] Rosso A(2016)Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study Lancet Oncol 17 1105-1113

[4] Skaane P(2019)Cost differences between digital tomosynthesis and standard digital mammography in a breast cancer screening programme: results from the To-Be trial in Norway Eur J Health Econ 20 1261-1269

[5] Sebuødegård S(2008)European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition—summary document Ann Oncol 19 614-622

[6] Bandos AI(2021)Interval breast cancer rates and tumor characteristics in the prospective population-based Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial Radiology 299 559-567

[7] Bernardi D(2019)A randomized controlled trial of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in population-based screening in Bergen: interim analysis of performance indicators from the To-Be trial Eur Radiol 29 1175-1186

[8] Macaskill P(2022)One view or two views for wide-angle tomosynthesis with synthetic mammography in the assessment setting? Eur Radiol 32 661-670

[9] Pellegrini M(2017)Accuracy and reading time for six strategies using digital breast tomosynthesis in women with mammographically negative dense breasts Eur Radiol 27 5179-5184

[10] Moger TA(2016)Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis with a wide scan angle compared to full-field digital mammography for the detection and characterization of microcalcifications Eur J Radiol 85 2161-2168

[1] Zackrisson S(2018)One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study Lancet Oncol 19 1493-1503

[2] Lång K(2018)Performance of breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis: results from the prospective population-based Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial Breast Cancer Res Treat 169 489-496

[3] Rosso A(2016)Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study Lancet Oncol 17 1105-1113

[4] Skaane P(2019)Cost differences between digital tomosynthesis and standard digital mammography in a breast cancer screening programme: results from the To-Be trial in Norway Eur J Health Econ 20 1261-1269

[5] Sebuødegård S(2008)European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition—summary document Ann Oncol 19 614-622

[6] Bandos AI(2021)Interval breast cancer rates and tumor characteristics in the prospective population-based Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial Radiology 299 559-567

[7] Bernardi D(2019)A randomized controlled trial of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in population-based screening in Bergen: interim analysis of performance indicators from the To-Be trial Eur Radiol 29 1175-1186

[8] Macaskill P(2022)One view or two views for wide-angle tomosynthesis with synthetic mammography in the assessment setting? Eur Radiol 32 661-670

[9] Pellegrini M(2017)Accuracy and reading time for six strategies using digital breast tomosynthesis in women with mammographically negative dense breasts Eur Radiol 27 5179-5184

[10] Moger TA(2016)Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis with a wide scan angle compared to full-field digital mammography for the detection and characterization of microcalcifications Eur J Radiol 85 2161-2168