Definition of left ventricular remodelling following ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review of cardiac magnetic resonance studies in the past decade

被引:0
作者
Damien Legallois
Amir Hodzic
Joachim Alexandre
Charles Dolladille
Eric Saloux
Alain Manrique
Vincent Roule
Fabien Labombarda
Paul Milliez
Farzin Beygui
机构
[1] FHU REMOD-VHF,Department of Cardiology, Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CHU de Caen Normandie, EA4650 (SEILIRM)
[2] Inserm Comete,Department of Clinical Physiology, Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CHU de Caen Normandie
[3] FHU REMOD-VHF,Department of Pharmacology, Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CHU de Caen Normandie, EA4650 (SEILIRM)
[4] FHU REMOD-VHF,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CHU de Caen Normandie, EA4650 (SEILIRM)
[5] Investigations chez l’Homme,GIP Cyceron PET Center
[6] CHU de Caen Normandie,Department of Cardiology, Normandie Univ, UNICAEN
来源
Heart Failure Reviews | 2022年 / 27卷
关键词
ST-elevation myocardial infarction; Left ventricular remodelling; Cardiac magnetic resonance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
An increase in left ventricular volumes between baseline and follow-up imaging is the main criteria for the quantification of left ventricular remodelling (LVR) after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but without consensual definition. We aimed to review the criteria used for the definition of LVR based on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in STEMI patients. A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library from January 2010 to August 2019. Thirty-seven studies involving 4209 patients were included. Among these studies, 30 (81%) used a cut-off value for defining LVR, with a pooled LVR prevalence estimate of 22.8%, 95% CI [19.4–26.7%] and a major between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 82%). The seven remaining studies (19%) defined LVR as a continuous variable. The definition of LVR using CMR following STEMI is highly variable, among studies including highly selected patients. A 20% increase or a 15% increase in left ventricular volumes between a baseline and a follow-up CMR imaging were the two most common criterion (13 [35%] and 9 [24%] studies, respectively). The most frequent LVR criterion was a 20% increase in end-diastolic volumes or a 15% increase in end-systolic volumes. A composite cut-off value of a 12 to 15% increase in end-systolic volume and a 12 to 20% increase in end-diastolic volume using a follow-up CMR imaging 3 months after STEMI might be proposed as a consensual cut-off for defining adverse LVR for future large-sized, prospective studies with serial CMR imaging and long-term follow-up in unselected patients.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 48
页数:11
相关论文
共 592 条
[51]  
Ramlall M(2017)Sources of variability in quantification of cardiovascular magnetic resonance infarct size - reproducibility among three core laboratories J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 19 62-undefined
[52]  
Hamarneh A(2018)Individual participant data analysis of two trials on aldosterone blockade in myocardial infarction Heart 104 1843-undefined
[53]  
Sirker A(2017)Defining left ventricular remodeling following acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction using cardiovascular magnetic resonance J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 19 26-undefined
[54]  
Herrey AS(2011)Timing of cardiovascular MR imaging after acute myocardial infarction: effect on estimates of infarct characteristics and prediction of late ventricular remodeling Radiology 261 116-undefined
[55]  
Manisty C(2008)Comparison of the reproducibility of quantitative cardiac left ventricular assessments in healthy volunteers using different MRI scanners: a multicenter simulation J Magn Reson Imaging 28 359-undefined
[56]  
Yellon DM(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[57]  
Kellman P(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[58]  
Moon JC(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[59]  
Hausenloy DJ(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[60]  
Mele D(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined