PROMETHEE Group Decision Support System and the House of Quality

被引:26
作者
Behzadian, Majid [1 ]
Hosseini-Motlagh, Seyyed-Mahdi [2 ]
Ignatius, Joshua [3 ]
Goh, Mark [4 ]
Sepehri, Mohammad Mehdi [5 ]
机构
[1] Shomal Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Amol, Iran
[2] Iran Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Ind Engn, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Math Sci, George Town, Malaysia
[4] Univ S Australia, Sch Management, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[5] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
GDSS PROMETHEE; QFD; House of quality; GAIA; FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; DESIGN REQUIREMENTS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; MAKING APPROACH; QFD; MODEL; AHP; OPTIMIZATION; INTEGRATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1007/s10726-011-9257-3
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Quality function deployment (QFD) is a multi-step method that monitors customer needs throughout a product development process. The House of Quality (HOQ) exercise undertaken in the first phase of QFD is considered as the most important, since customer needs must be accurately translated into a set of technical requirements for the final product. This paper provides a PROMETHEE group decision support system (GDSS) approach that integrates the design preferences of the QFD team. We highlight the selection and ranking of the technical requirements in the HOQ exercise, where a group of multidisciplinary decision makers (DMs) in a globally dispersed QFD team is required to input their individual preferences. Our approach advances the HOQ group decision making context in three important areas. First, it treats each criterion and DM as unique in terms of the preference function and threshold levels. Second, it seeks a multi-criteria approach for the HOQ process, where some DMs may play a more important role than others on a certain criterion. Third, sensitivity analysis through the Geometrical Analysis for Interactive Assistance (GAIA) plane provides valuable information about the conflicts, similarities, or independencies between the criterion and the DMs, respectively. A case on an automotive part illustrates the performance of the PROMOTHEE approach with GAIA.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 205
页数:17
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] AN AHP FRAMEWORK FOR PRIORITIZING CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS IN QFD - AN INDUSTRIALIZED HOUSING APPLICATION
    ARMACOST, RL
    COMPONATION, PJ
    MULLENS, MA
    SWART, WW
    [J]. IIE TRANSACTIONS, 1994, 26 (04) : 72 - 79
  • [2] A web-based system for analyzing the voices of call center customers in the service industry
    Bae, SM
    Ha, SH
    Park, SC
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2005, 28 (01) : 29 - 41
  • [3] Inexact genetic algorithm approach to target values setting of engineering requirements in QFD
    Bai, H
    Kwong, CK
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2003, 41 (16) : 3861 - 3881
  • [4] PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications
    Behzadian, Majid
    Kazemadeh, R. B.
    Albadvi, A.
    Aghdasi, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 200 (01) : 198 - 215
  • [5] Quality function deployment (QFD) - can it be used to develop food products?
    Benner, M
    Linnemann, AR
    Jongen, WMF
    Folstar, P
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2003, 14 (04) : 327 - 339
  • [6] Brans J P, 1985, MANAGE SCI, V31, P641
  • [7] Group decision making to better respond customer needs in software development
    Büyüközkan, G
    Feyzioglu, O
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 48 (02) : 427 - 441
  • [8] Fuzzy group decision-making to multiple preference formats in quality function deployment
    Buyukozkan, Gulcin
    Feyzioglu, Orhan
    Ruan, Da
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2007, 58 (05) : 392 - 402
  • [9] AHP IN POLITICAL GROUP DECISIONS - A STUDY IN THE ART OF POSSIBILITIES
    CARLSSON, C
    WALDEN, P
    [J]. INTERFACES, 1995, 25 (04) : 14 - 29
  • [10] A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example
    Chan, LK
    Wu, ML
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 33 (02): : 119 - 139