Effects of different numerical algorithms on simulation of chemical dissolution-front instability in fluid-saturated porous rocks不同数值算法对模拟饱水孔隙岩石中化学溶解面非稳定性的影响

被引:0
作者
Chong-bin Zhao
Bruce Hobbs
Alison Ord
机构
[1] Central South University,Computational Geosciences Research Centre
[2] The University of Western Australia,School of Earth and Environment
来源
Journal of Central South University | 2018年 / 25卷
关键词
numerical algorithm; chemical dissolution; front instability; computational simulation; porous rocks; 数值算法; 化学溶解; 溶解面非稳定性; 计算模拟; 孔隙岩石;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Many scientific and engineering problems need to use numerical methods and algorithms to obtain computational simulation results because analytical solutions are seldom available for them. The chemical dissolution-front instability problem in fluid-saturated porous rocks is no exception. Since this kind of instability problem has both the conventional (i.e. trivial) and the unconventional (i.e. nontrivial) solutions, it is necessary to examine the effects of different numerical algorithms, which are used to solve chemical dissolution-front instability problems in fluid-saturated porous rocks. Toward this goal, two different numerical algorithms associated with the commonly-used finite element method are considered in this paper. In the first numerical algorithm, the porosity, pore-fluid pressure and acid/solute concentration are selected as basic variables, while in the second numerical algorithm, the porosity, velocity of pore-fluid flow and acid/solute concentration are selected as basic variables. The particular attention is paid to the effects of these two numerical algorithms on the computational simulation results of unstable chemical dissolution-front propagation in fluid-saturated porous rocks. The related computational simulation results have demonstrated that: 1) the first numerical algorithm associated with the porosity-pressure-concentration approach can realistically simulate the evolution processes of unstable chemical dissolution-front propagation in chemical dissolution systems. 2) The second numerical algorithm associated with the porosity-velocity-concentration approach fails to simulate the evolution processes of unstable chemical dissolution-front propagation. 3) The extra differential operation is the main source to result in the failure of the second numerical algorithm.
引用
收藏
页码:1966 / 1975
页数:9
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Chadam J(1986)Reactive infiltration instabilities [J] IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics 36 207-221
[2]  
Hoff D(1988)A weekly nonlinear stability analysis of the reactive infiltration interface [J] IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics 48 1362-1378
[3]  
Merino E(2000)Numerical modeling of reaction-induced cavities in a porous rock [J] Journal of Geophysical Research 105 16737-16747
[4]  
Ortoleva P(1987)Geochemical self-organization II: The reactive-infiltration instability [J] American Journal of Science 287 1008-1040
[5]  
Sen A(2002)Numerical simulation of the evolution of aquifer porosity and species concentrations during reactive transport [J] Computers and Geosciences 28 485-499
[6]  
Chadam J(2009)Effects of mechanical dispersion on the morphological evolution of a chemical dissolution front in a fluid-saturated porous medium [J] Journal of Hydrology 373 96-102
[7]  
Ortoleva P(2014)Effect of permeability-porosity functions on simulated morphological evolution of a chemical dissolution front in a fluid-saturated porous medium [J] Hydrological Processes 28 16-24
[8]  
Sen A(2008)Theoretical and numerical analyses of chemical dissolution front instability in fluid-saturated porous rocks [J] International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 32 1107-1130
[9]  
Ormond A(2017)A new alternative approach for investigating acidization dissolution front propagation in fluid-saturated rocks [J] Science China: Technological Sciences 60 1197-1210
[10]  
Ortoleva P(2017)Effects of porosity heterogeneity on chemical dissolution-front instability in fluid-saturated rocks [J] Journal of Central South University 24 720-725