General population normative data from seven European countries for the K10 and K6 scales for psychological distress

被引:0
作者
J. Lehmann
M. J. Pilz
B. Holzner
G. Kemmler
J. M. Giesinger
机构
[1] Medical University of Innsbruck,Health Outcomes Research Unit, University Hospital of Psychiatry II
[2] Medical University of Innsbruck,University Hospital of Psychiatry I
来源
Scientific Reports | / 13卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress scale (K10) and its 6-item short-form version (K6) measure psychological distress, particularly anxiety or depressive symptoms. While these questionnaire scales are widely used in various settings and populations, general population normative data are rarely available. To facilitate the interpretation of K10 and K6 scores, we provide normative general population data from seven European countries. We used an online survey to collect K10 data from general population samples in Austria, Italy, Germany, France, the Netherlands, Poland and Spain. We calculated the age- and sex-specific normative values separately for each country. For more specific estimates of K10 and K6 scores for individuals or groups, we also established a multivariable regression model based on socio-demographic and health data. In total, N = 7,087 adults participated in our study (51.6% women; mean age, 49.6 years). The mean K10 score in the total sample was 8.5 points (standard deviation, 7.3) on 0–40 points metric, with mean scores in individual countries ranging from 6.9 (the Netherlands) to 9.9 (Spain). Women showed higher scores than men and younger participants scored higher than older participants. Our study is the first to present normative K10 and K6 data from several European countries using a consistent sampling approach. These reference values will facilitate the interpretation of K10 and K6 scores in clinical research and practice and also highlight the variation in psychological distress levels across countries and groups according to their socio-demographic and health characteristics.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 246 条
[1]  
Steel Z(2014)The global prevalence of common mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013 Int. J. Epidemiol. 43 476-493
[2]  
Marnane C(2007)Stigmatization, social distance and exclusion because of mental illness: The individual with mental illness as a 'stranger' Int. Rev. Psychiatry 19 131-135
[3]  
Iranpour C(1992)The structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). I: History, rationale, and description Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 49 624-629
[4]  
Chey T(1988)The composite international diagnostic interview. An epidemiologic Instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 45 1069-1077
[5]  
Jackson JW(2018)Postpartum depression screening tools: A review Psychosomatics 59 211-219
[6]  
Patel V(2019)Early autism screening: A comprehensive review Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18 3502-86
[7]  
Silove D(2021)International consensus on a standard set of outcome measures for child and youth anxiety, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder Lancet Psychiatry 8 76-976
[8]  
Baumann AE(2002)Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress Psychol. Med. 32 959-72
[9]  
Spitzer RL(2006)Factor structure and interpretation of the K10 Psychol. Assess. 18 62-120
[10]  
Williams JB(2007)Evaluation of 2 measures of psychological distress as screeners for depression in the general population Can. J. Psychiatry 52 111-362