Hope that Benefits Others: A Systematic Literature Review of Hope Theory and Prosocial Outcomes

被引：0
作者：
Schornick Z. [1 ]
Ellis N. [1 ]
Ray E. [2 ]
Snyder B.-J. [1 ]
Thomas K. [3 ]
机构：
[1] The College of Applied Behavioral Sciences, University of Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN
[2] Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN
[3] Psychology Department, Hope College, Holland, MI
来源：
International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology | 2023年 / 8卷 / 1期
关键词：
Character development; Hope; Hope Theory; Prosociality; Systematic review;
D O I：
10.1007/s41042-022-00084-0
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
This systematic literature review serves to illuminate the state of research that examines empirical evidence of hope and other-oriented variables (i.e. benefit individuals other than those who are being measured in the included studies). Thirteen articles were eligible for inclusion after the screening process and snowballing. Hope was positively related to variables such as social support seeking, altruism, community and social participation, and acting in favor of helping others. Data from the included studies revealed that individuals who score high on hope perform more behaviors that benefit others. These findings indicate that Hope Theory might provide a small glimpse into its definition of hope as a virtue that benefits others. This systematic review points to the dearth of research of hope as an individual difference that benefits others, but the potential of this line of inquiry. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
引用
收藏
页码：37 / 61
页数：24
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Berkowitz M.W., Bier M.C., McCauley B., Toward a science of character education: Frameworks for identifying and implementing effective practices, Journal of Character Education, 13, 1, pp. 33-51, (2017)
  • [2] Bernardo A.B., Extending hope theory: Internal and external locus of trait hope, Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 8, pp. 944-949, (2010)
  • [3] Blake J., Yaghmaian R., Brooks J., Fais C., Chan F., Attachment, hope, and participation: Testing an expanded model of Snyder’s hope theory for prediction of participation for individuals with spinal cord injury, Rehabilitation Psychology, 63, 2, pp. 230-239, (2018)
  • [4] Boiman-Meshita M., Littman-Ovadia H., Is it me or you? An actor-partner examination of the relationship between partners’ character strengths and marital quality, Journal of Happiness Studies, 23, 1, pp. 195-210, (2022)
  • [5] Brauer K., Sendatzki R., Gander F., Ruch W., Proyer R.T., Profile Similarities Among Romantic Partners’ Character Strengths and Their Associations with Relationship-and Life Satisfaction, (2022)
  • [6] Cardol M., de Haan R.J., van den Bos G.A., de Jong B.A., de Groot I.J., The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: The Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA), Clinical Rehabilitation, 13, 5, pp. 411-419, (1999)
  • [7] Caspi A., Roberts B.W., Shiner R.L., Personality development: Stability and change, Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 1, pp. 453-484, (2005)
  • [8] Cedeno L.A., Elias M.J., Kelly S., Chu B.C., School violence, adjustment, and the influence of hope on low-income, African American youth, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80, 2, pp. 213-226, (2010)
  • [9] Cheavens J.S., Heiy J.E., Feldman D.B., Benitez C., Rand K.L., Hope, goals, and pathways: Further validating the hope scale with observer ratings, The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14, 4, pp. 452-462, (2019)
  • [10] Corn B.W., Feldman D.B., Wexler I., The science of hope, The Lancet. Oncology, 21, 9, pp. e452-e459, (2020)
1234567