Understanding and Managing Responsible Innovation

被引:0
作者
Hans Bennink
机构
[1] HAN University of Applied Sciences,Hogeschool van Arnhem en Nijmegen
来源
Philosophy of Management | 2020年 / 19卷
关键词
Responsible innovation; Innovation themes; Moral aspects of innovation; Spearheads of innovation theory and practice;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As a relational concept, responsible innovation can be made more tangible by asking innovation of what and responsibility of whom for what? Arranging the scattered field of responsible innovation comprehensively, starting from an anthropological point of view, into five fields of tension and five categories of spearheads, may be theoretically and practically helpful while offering suggestions for both research and management.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 348
页数:31
相关论文
共 120 条
[1]  
Achterhuis H(1995)De moralisering van de apparaten Socialisme en Democratie 52 3-12
[2]  
Anokhin S(2009)Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption Journal of Business Venturing 24 465-476
[3]  
Schulze WS(2011)Why moral philosophers are not and should not be moral experts Bioethics 25 119-127
[4]  
Archard D(2007)Innovation as an argument for corporate social responsibility Journal of Business and Public Policy 1 1-21
[5]  
Asongu JJ(2017)Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility Academy of Management Annals 11 105-149
[6]  
Bansal P(2008)Fostering creativity and innovation without encouraging unethical behavior Journal of Business Ethics 81 97-115
[7]  
Song HC(1999)Toward an ethics of persuasive technology Communications of the ACM 42 51-58
[8]  
Baucus MS(2018)Philosophy of innovation: A research agenda Philosophy of Management 17 1-5
[9]  
Norton WI(2004)Living in a world of smart everyday objects - social, economic, and ethical implications Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 10 763-785
[10]  
Baucus DA(2013)From Confrontation to Partnership. The Role of a Dutch Non-Governmental Organisation in Co-Creating a Market to Address the Issue of Animal Welfare International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 16 69-75